I did not intend for this to be a part of my new small
series on the persecuted church but as I began to write I realized it would be.
Sometime after Hitler came to power, in 1934, pastor Paul Schneider,
the first Confessing Church martyr officiated at a funeral for a young man of
the Hitler Youth. It was supposed to be a Christian funeral. During the rite a
deputy of the Hitler Youth spoke of fate gathering him to his fathers and said
the young man, “had now crossed over into the storm of Horst Wessel.” This was
said twice and Schneider protested because this was a Christian ceremony. In a
letter to his superintendent he wrote, “I protest. This is a church ceremony,
and as a Protestant pastor I am responsible for the pure teaching of the Holy Scriptures.”[i]
This led to Schneider’s first arrest. He would be arrested several
times, lose his churches, be beaten in prison and finally poisoned to death.
But what is the storm of Horst Wessel. And who is he.
He was a soldier in the German army who was shot and became
a mythical creation of the paganized Nazis. They used his death to unite their rallies
and turn their followers as much as possible away from their Christian faith. Goebbels
speaks of Wessel’s immortalization. The
storm of Horst Wessel was meant to evoke a pagan eternity earned by Germanic patriotism.
Goebbels, Hitler’s chief propagandist, used this idea in at least two of his
speeches. He began the myth with a speech, Raise High the Flag,
the first part of a poem written by Wessel.
The author of Paul Schneider writes:
National Socialism wanted to
introduce its worldview to the German people openly but it did so surreptitiously
because it knew it was incompatible with a biblically based faith. Its “national”
faith was not permitted to know anything about the “full reality of sin so
deeply rooted in the heart and life of man” because it alone felt chosen to set
the standard and did not tolerate any critical discussion.
This can be seen in many of Goebbels’ and other Nazi
speeches and writings. There was always the righteous, (the Nazis) and the despicable
(all others who rejected Nazism). It is constantly there as here in an early
Nazi speech; The Storm is Coming:
You, men, women, and comrades, are
the bearers, witnesses, builders, and finishers of this unique people’s
uprising. Our policies have not been popular. We have served the truth, and
only the truth. For twelve years, they have insulted and outlawed and slandered
and persecuted us. Now that we are standing at the doorway to power, Marxist
lies have joined with bourgeois weakness to fight us. Were we only a party like
all the rest, we would collapse under the offensive of our opponents. But we
are a people’s movement. That is our good fortune. Here and everywhere else in
the land, the red shining Swastika flag flies over people of all camps,
parties, classes, occupations, and religious confessions. Our opponents laughed
at us in the past, but they laugh no longer.
You men and women standing before
me, a hundred or two hundred thousand in number, with heads high, upright,
proud, and brave, the carriers of Germany’s future, in your eyes it is written:
We think no longer in terms of
class. We are not workers or middle class. We are not first of all Protestants
or Catholics. We do not ask about ancestry or class. Together we share the
words of the poet:
“People, rise up, and storm, break
loose!” …
So our dead comrade Horst Wessel
wrote, and we are fulfilling his prophesy. The others may lie, slander, and
pour their scorn on us — their political days are numbered.
Adolf Hitler is knocking at the
gates of power, and in his fist are joined the fists of millions of workers and
farmers. The time of shame and disgrace is nearly over.
You are the witnesses, the
builders, the will-bearers of our idea and our worldview.
So this is the pattern; (1)a great need, (2)a hero to lift up,
(3) enemies who are worthless, (4)the righteous who are the builders. This is
the Fascist’s method of propaganda. But it came up against biblical truth which
declares all humanity sinners and only one solution the death and resurrection of
Jesus Christ who gifts humanity with mercy, forgiveness and rather than immortalization,
eternal life and bodily resurrection.
As I have placed the suffering church in contrast to a
despotic government in my last posting, The
Historical Suffering Church: Its Image, Its Faith Extending Over Our Tomorrows:,
I will place this image of a suffering pastor and a despotic government beside
a government official who now pushes the same propaganda. Stephen Miller, President
Trump’s deputy chief, speaking at the memorial service for Charlie Kirk, uses,
often the same words and concepts as Goebbels.
The image of storm is often used in Nazi speeches—Miller—"The
storm whispers to the warrior that you cannot withstand my strength and the
warrior whispers back I am the storm.” He then calls Erika Kirk the storm, but
hardly; she is the forgiving Christian. The praise of the hero; Miller’s
speech, “You thought you could kill Charlie Kirk. You have made him an immortal.”
The praise of the Nazi followers is often wrapped up in the
title builders, “You are the witnesses, the builders, the will-bearers of our
idea and our worldview.” Miller, “We are the ones who build, we are the ones
who create, we are the ones who lift up humanity.”
There is always the enemy in the Nazi propaganda, for Miller
that is also true:
You have nothing, you are nothing,
you are wickedness, you are jealousy, you are envy. You are hatred, you are
nothing, you can build nothing, you can produce nothing, you can create nothing.
Here is the anti-Christian attack on Christianity too often
used by Miller. Taking MAGA’s supposed Lineage all the way back to Athens and
Rome he places their humanity and goodness in a racial context which eliminates
the other. He adds righteousness to them because of their supposed lack of
sinfulness. He glorifies what is sinful and so shuts them out of the Kingdom of
God for the sake of the kingdom of man. At this funeral he shuts the door on
Christian faith never mentioning it—yes, he mentions angels whose tears put
fire into the hearts of the supposed righteous ones. That is unbiblical but
also borders on the edge of paganism as does his words of awaking a dragon in
them—in MAGA—in those who follow Trump. “you have no idea of the dragon you have
awakened, you have no idea how determined we will be to save this civilization,
to save the west, to save this republic …”
The book of Revelation filled with metaphors speaks of a
dragon. His war isn’t good, he attempts to kill Jesus, he lives in rage and
gives his power to a despotic being—he ends in hell.
The Christian, those who pray to always put Jesus above any
worldly ruler, needs no propaganda in its cruder form, they have the Holy
Scriptures—the Word of God, the promises of God.
Therefore if you have been raised up with Christ, keep
seeking the things above, where is Christ is seated at the right hand of God.
Set your mind on the things above, not on the things that are on the earth. For
you have died and your life is hidden with Christ in God. When Christ who is our
life is revealed then you also will be revealed with Him in glory. (Colossians
3: 1-4.)
[i] Rudolf
Wentorf, Paul Schneider: Witness of Buchenwald, (Vancouver: Regent
College Publishing 2008) 152-153.
8 comments:
Hello Viola,
I commend you for putting these historical events and speeches together in such obvious and unmistakable ways. I really hope people are listening and changing their minds.
I felt it was as if the Holy Spirit showed up at Charlie Kirk's funeral and inspired Erika, Trump and Miller to articulate, as clearly as possible, in a way no Evangelical could possibly miss, the choice that God is placing before the MAGA Evangelicals.
The Dragon is against Christ; and Miller made it clear, if it wasn't already obvious, they are the Dragon.
Erika presented the Gospel of Christ on the Cross: loving his enemies, praying for them, and forgiving them.
And Trump, speaking from the heart, rejected Erika's witness to His message from the Cross. Hugging Erika with a blank stare on his face, he proclaimed to disagree with her message, to hate his enemies, and to want revenge; not even against the killer but against the whole class of all of those who oppose him ("Vengeance is mine, says the Lord").
You could not better define a polar opposite to the Gospel of Jesus Christ. The leader of the MAGA movement literally proclaims himself to be against Christ.
They all agreed they were at a turning point, but it's not the one they thought it would be. I think the Holy Spirit presented them the simple choice they now must make:
"Follow Jesus or Follow Trump"
Jodie Gallo
Los Angeles, CA
I was curious and read both speeches.
Goebbels quotes a popular poem written during the Napoleonic wars when he uses that line about the storm, and Miller quotes an anonymous saying that has been popularly used since at least 2006 by individuals of all political backgrounds to express resolution in the face of hardship.
Miller is not referencing Goebbel's poetry quotation, which calls on people to "rise up, and storm..." (verb). Rather, Miller's quote of a popular saying personifies those struggling as the storm (noun). This may seem like a silly distinction, but the former is encouraging people to engage in violence against their current government ("...storm, break loose!") while the latter is meant as encouraging to people undergoing a time of difficulty because they agree with their current government, not urging for revolution.
There is no racial reference in Miller's speech. He is very clearly talking about the lineage of western civilization, and specifically Democracy as practiced in the US, not white people or Aryanism. He brings up the roots of democracy as Athens, Rome, Philadelphia (known as "the birthplace of Democracy") and Monticello (another famous place where the meaning of Democracy in the West was teased out). Athens and Rome are in fact where the beginnings of western civilization took root. Is that in question? Is it somehow racist to believe that?
As far as addressing an enemy, it is pretty clear at this point that he was not talking about Jews, gays or people of color, but people who argue that Charlie Kirk deserved to be shot because they disagreed with him. I will add the full quote to give it the context you missed.
" And to those trying to incite violence against us, those trying to foment hatred against us: what do you have? You have nothing. You are nothing. You are wickedness, you are jealousy, you are envy, you are hatred. You are nothing. You can build nothing. You can produce nothing. You can create nothing. We are the ones who build. We are the ones who create. We are the ones who lift up humanity."
He isn't talking about a racial or ethnic or even specifically Democrat Party enemy. He is talking very clearly about people who have been calling him, (and Charlie Kirk) a new "Goebbels", and Trump a new "Hitler". He is talking about people who have been using rhetoric to describe the conservative movement that is so bombastic, misleading and overtly encouraging of violence that it is now inspiring mentally ill people on the left to kill out of fear and hate. That seems pretty clear.
Did you know that popular commentators on the left in the US and Europe are making out that the entire memorial service was like a nazi rally, and claiming this is "the Reichstag fire" moment for the US? The rhetoric is not peaceful and the clear implications are that if you care about democracy and justice you should take drastic measures.
https://www.patheos.com/blogs/faithonthefringe/2025/09/republicans-have-found-their-reichstag-moment/
https://www.seattletimes.com/opinion/is-this-americas-reichstag-fire-moment/
You can certainly disagree with Miller and Trump about immigration policy, and have insightful and meaningful commentary about it. But sharing social media propaganda that literally demonizes someone as a nazi is not helpful or christian. It is playing into satan's hand, since he is the prince of lies, and it will only lead to more deaths caused by mentally ill leftists.
And as far as the lovely lady here in the comments claiming that the "Holy Spirit" is giving us the choice to "follow Jesus or follow Trump"--the spirit that you are speaking for is not Holy. No one in their right mind is following Trump as a spiritual leader or replacement for Christ; we voted for him to be the less-damaging than Biden/Harris/Waltz secular president of our post-christian nation, not God.
I would also quickly note that the whole Goebbels and Miller thing is being promoted by anti-Israel activists as well, who see Miller as a dangerous "Zionist". So when you share this false comparison, recall in whose company you are standing.
https://davidicke.com/2025/09/22/this-is-a-speech-by-ultra-zionist-trump-handler-stephen-miller-that-should-be-called-how-we-are-going-to-use-the-death-of-charlie-kirk-to-build-our-tyranny-by-targeting-all-those-who-would-challeng/
https://www.mind-war.com/p/rent-a-regime-change-bibi-and-the
Melissa you haven't left your name but I know its you so I want delete you. As far as the connection between Goebbels speeches and Millers I looked at Snopes and they basically said what I said,
"Miller's and Goebbels' speeches have rhetorical similarities, including the use of "storm" imagery, the call to people to "rise," the exhortations to "build," and the idea of seeking vengeance for the death of a key figure in their movements. Miller did not plagiarize Goebbels' speech word for word, but some similarities exist. Furthermore, Democrats and watchdog groups have accused Miller of frequently promoting and repeating neo-Nazi and white nationalist views.
While we cannot outright confirm that Miller copied Goebbels' speech, we can observe the similarities. Whether Miller intended for such similarities to appear can only be confirmed by Miller himself. We have reached out to The White House to learn more about Miller's inspirations for the speech. A spokesperson did not respond to our queries and questioned the basis for writing such an article."
I added what I believed to be the purpose and here is the reason I would do that. I have written before about Miller using a group that writes about hate groups, The Southern Poverty Law Center. I don't agree with their views on marriage but they do a great job of writing about hate groups. This is from my other article:
"In their article, one of several, they speak of his early bent toward racism, but it is his e-mails sent to Breitbart’s editor I want to highlight. This went from 2015 to 2016. I will quote:
“The emails show evidence of Miller’s indulgence and sharing of the racist source material he relied upon to define the ethos of his immigration policies. Throughout the emails, Miller promotes literature, conspiracy theories, and policies supported by white nationalist and anti-immigrant hate groups. In a Sept. 6, 2015, email to Breitbart’s McHugh, Miller suggested that they write about Jean Raspail’s, “The Camp of the Saints,” a racist French novel popular among white nationalist and neo-Nazis.
The novel is popular within extremist circles because of its dramatized depiction of “white genocide,” also referred to as the “great replacement” conspiracy theory. According to this theory, white people of European descent are being systematically displaced in the Western world.” When Raspail died in June 2020, VDARE author Steve Sailer, who Miller linked to in his emails to McHugh, publicly mourned his loss.”
I am familiar with the book, The Camp of the Saints, it is often referred to by racists. When I read that this was in Miller’s e-mails I knew for certain that he is a racist and his deportation polices which he uses to advice President Trump are couched in his racism. SPLC continues with their article:
“The novel utilizes an apocalyptic plot in which Indian refugees invade France, and their failure to assimilate or adopt French cultural norms ultimately leads to the domination of the white population. The main antagonist is referred to as the “turd eater.” In one section of the novel, a white woman is raped to death by a group of brown-skinned refugees. Additionally, another part of the novel depicts the killing of a pro-refugee leftist by a nationalist character because of the leftist’s support of race mixing.
Miller recommended that Breitbart write about the novel in response to Pope Francis’ expressions of sympathy for refugees. Miller wrote, “you see the Pope saying west must, in effect, get rid of borders. Someone should point out the parallels to Camp of the Saints.”
I have seen that book used by many white supremist groups- it is to me at least a clear sign of Miller's racism.
Tonight is my mystery night= watching I mean. So I won't write more now. But later to you and Jodie who by the way is a guy.
Yes, this is Melissa, I didn't realize Google was posting these as anonymous, it's supposed to show my name at the top, but it looks like that's not working.
Rod Dreher thinks Camp of the Saints is offensive but also an important critique of the European attitude of cultural self-hatred that is destroying countries like France and England and Germany, where immigrants are given legal protections and social care that native Europeans are not, and where muslim populations are now literally replacing the native European populations numerically.
There is no "great replacement theory" as far as statistics go. It is already a thing. In places like England it will almost certainly lead to civil war within my lifetime or that of my children. The government there continues to allow in illegal immigrants and give them priority over the native English poor in allocating all kinds of government help that used to be given to the poor. The local and national government also spent years covering up a huge issue with organized gangs of Pakistani men grooming, horrifically sexually abusing and pimping poor underage white girls, including in one case killing and cooking a girl. This involves thousands of girls, now young women, and may in fact still be going on. The police and local governments for years would not do anything about it because they did not want to be perceived as racist. It has only recently been admitted and the government is still fighting attempts to address it on a national level.
Violence in general, and specifically violence against women, is happening at a higher rate specifically because of Muslim immigration in Europe.
According to the European new page DW, " Overall, the number of crimes recorded in Germany rose to 5.94 million last year, an increase of 5.5% over 2023 and 9.3% higher than in 2019, before the pandemic.
The number of suspects arrested rose by 7.3% to 2.246 million and 41.3% of them did not have a German passport.
Among the people without German nationality who were charged, 402,514 were described as refugees, asylum seekers and those who entered the country illegally."
According to Eurostat, an official data page of the EU:
"From 2013 to 2023 the number of sexual violence offences, including rape, as recorded by police in the EU, has shown a steady increase, reaching a 79.2% increase in 2023 as compared with 2013. The number of rape offences, as a part of sexual violence offences, more than doubled during this period (a 141% increase) (Figure 3). In 2023, 243 715 sexual violence offences (including 91 370 rape offences) were registered, showing a 5.5% increase (including a 7% increase in rape) compared with 2022."
According to Wikipedia, in England: "According to the National Crime Agency (NCA), human trafficking in the United Kingdom is rapidly increasing.[9] The number of potential victims referred to the National Referral Mechanism (NRM) rose from 2,340 in 2014 to more than 10,000 in 2020.[10] There was also an increase in convictions from 71.9% in 2019 to 73.8% in 2020.[11]"
The only countries not suffering from huge increases in sexual violence in the EU are those like Hungary, who refused to accept mass immigration. The Camp of the Saints is certainly offensive, but to say that it's just racist screed is to miss the whole point of the book. Even First Things had an article about it recently, expressing this same view.
Are First Things and Rod Dreher nazi or fascist, or even racist, simply because they view with dismay what is happening in Europe and what may happen here without intervention?
Also a note, you will not find much information about what is happening in Europe in American media, or the BBC, all of which tend to cover it up and claim that anyone who speaks up about it is racist. Popular uprising because of immigration in England are often characterized as "far right" and racist, even though they include non-white English citizens and are happening because of government prioritization of immigrants, not race. You have to look for more conservative European news sources like UnHerd, or make very specific internet searches for accurate information.
For those interested here is First Things article on Camp of the Saints, https://firstthings.com/spiritual-death-of-the-west/ And here is a review by the New York Times, https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/22/books/stephen-miller-camp-saints.html and just for fun here is an article about the man who coined the term "the great Replacement" https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/20/world/europe/renaud-camus-great-replacement.html I envy him his French Castle.
Melissa I did read the First Things article and I have to tell you I didn't care for it. Too much intellectualizing so much it covered up the racism of the book. That might just be me but ever since Father Newhouse (sp) died I have not cared so much for First Things. Maybe it was his past Lutheranism that made it better. (Just teasing) I still believe it is an extremely offensive book, I do know it is loved by racist.
as far as your hard work of gathering all of the statistics on the population of Europe and England and crime rates, I'm not convinced that has anything to do with what I was writing about. Yes, we should not have totally open borders but neither should we be unmerciful to those who came here as children or have been here for years. This is all wrong. Before the election there was a group of bipartisan congresspeople who put together a reasonable immigration bill which would have passed but Trump told the republicans to not vote on it because he wanted to campaign on immigration. If we had that and ICE was truly arresting only criminals, I don't think any of us would be complaining.
Post a Comment