The
Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) is too often troubled by both universalism and
pluralism. The former is a belief that all are saved by Jesus Christ whether
called by some other faith such as Buddhism, or called by the name of Jesus
Christ. The latter, pluralism, is the belief that it is not necessary for Jesus
Christ to save—that is, there are many roads to God. One vice-moderator, in
a conversation with me, insisted on this particular view. In fact he was
upset that I had instead defined him as a universalist.
On the other
hand, a former executive presbyter of my presbytery, in a conversation about
the 2011 Presbyterian Panel survey, persisted in saying that universalism is a
possible biblical truth. The Presbyterian
Book of Order hints at that same kind of theological view.
Rev.
Dr. Charles Wiley III, coordinator of the Presbyterian Mission Agency’s
office of Theology and Worship recently attempted to redo a question/statement from the 2011,
survey which stated “Only followers of Jesus Christ can be saved.” Many supposedly
said no because they saw the question as rejecting the sovereignty of God. Wiley’s
better question was ““Is Jesus Christ the only Savior and Lord?”
Clearly an answer of “yes” to this question is not
pluralism and can be presumed to be orthodox. However, as I have noted, many in
this denomination are universalists and interpret reformed theology from that
position, in which case Wiley’s question, does not help. What of those who are
of another faith or who simply reject the saving work of Jesus?
An Arminian
believes that as his heart and mind cooperates with the overcoming power and
enlightenment of the Holy Spirit he is redeemed, forgiven, made new and becomes
a follower of Jesus Christ. As Van A. Harvey puts it in his small Handbook of Theological Terms, “… loosely
understood, it refers to those views that stress the ability of man to respond
to divine grace.” On the other hand, a Reformed Christian believes that she was
unable to cooperate with the Holy Spirit until she was overcome, redeemed and
made new by the working of God’s Spirit. She is then a follower of Jesus Christ
living in obedience to the word of God.
But notice, neither
of these two are saved without Jesus Christ. Not only is he the only Savior to
them but their redemption, transformation and continuing sanctification, is
utterly tied to their connection to him. They participate in Christ as they
follow his person.
To clarify a
problem. Some have stated that the Old Testament saints are not redeemed by
Jesus Christ. John Calvin would have none of this. Writing of the sacraments in
his fourth book of the Institutes, he
states this:
“But we have
already shown that sacraments are a kind of seals of the promises of God, so
let us hold it as a most certain truth, that no divine promise has ever been
offered to man except in Christ, and that hence when they remind us of any
divine promise, they must of necessity exhibit Christ. Hence that heavenly
pattern of the tabernacle and legal worship which was shown to Moses in the
mount. There is only this difference, that while the former shadowed forth a
promised Christ while he was still expected, the latter bear testimony to him
as already come and manifested.” (Chapter xiv. 20b)
Recently a
college conference at Montreat focused on John 3:16:
“For God so loved the world, that he
gave his only begotten Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have
eternal life.”
Some of the
material, which has seemingly been removed from the conference site, suggested
that there was too much emphasis on the perishing section of the verse. The
Presbyterian News Service posting, quoting Rev. Katie Cashwell, also states
of the conference speakers, “Our focus was to reclaim the well-known
Bible verse in John 3:16 as a message of love and welcome,” says Montreat
director for programs, the Rev. Katie Cashwell. “Too often it’s been used for
hate, intimidation and fear.”
This actually fits with the problem the PC (U.S.A.) faces
with the many who insist on an unbiblical universalism. But the good news
occurs because those who are perishing have eternal and full love offered to
them. The text of the third chapter states that it is not that Jesus Christ was
sent to judge the world, but that he was sent to save. And yet, humanity is
judged already because they have rejected the light.
This is
judgement, that the Light has come into the world, and men loved the darkness
rather than the Light for their deeds were evil. For every one who does evil
hates the Light and does not come to the light for fear that their deeds will
be exposed. But he who practices the truth comes to the light, so that his
deeds may be manifested as having been wrought in God.” (John 3:19-21)
9 comments:
Viola,
Concerning Charles Wiley's attempt at a clarifying question, would not a second, companion question nail down the issues of universalism and pluralism: "Will all human beings be saved?"
A no answer denies universalism, a yes answer confirms it, and an "I don't know" would show the ambivalence characterizing many in PCUSA leadership.
Yes, it should. And yet even universalists are hesitant to put such people as Hitler and Stalin in heaven or the Kingdom of God. In fact I believe it is probably harder for those progressives who deny Christ's work on the cross to envision any such person as part of the people of God.
As an further indicator of universalism, an earlier survey, the May 2006 Presbyterian Panel on Issues in the PC(USA), only 81% of pastors serving churches and 64% of specialized pastors agreed or strongly agreed with the statement: “Jesus is the way, and the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father except through him.”
How can you disagree with the words of Jesus. That is unbelievable. Do you have a link.
I've always interpreted "I am the way, the truth and life, no one comes to the Father except through me" to mean Jesus decides who comes to Father, and nobody else. He is the gate keeper.
Not Moses, not Peter, not Buddha, not Mohamed, not the Easter Bunny.
But if you asked me if a certain person is "saved" or not, I have to say, that according to Scripture, the answer to that question is above my pay grade. I hope Hitler rots in a very special corner of Hell, along with a few other people I can think of, but it's not my call. I am not a Universalist, or a Pluralist, or a Particularist. I just know my place.
It's just not my call. Per the Scriptures.
And I think Conservatives misunderstand Liberals, in some cases deliberately, when they discuss the subject.
Jodie Gallo
Los Angeles, CA
Viola, you asked for a link -
http://www.pcusa.org/site_media/media/uploads/research/pdfs/0506fullreport.pdf
Page 15 Question 1.b
Thanks Hardie, If you use strongly agree, and every Christian should strongly agree, those are Jesus' words after all, its much worse.
Haven't there been some recent tweaks in the Book of Order to make those who believe in Universalism (through Jesus Christ) more comfortable with Presbyterian theology? I'm uncomfortable with making our theology conform to the current church-political-correctness rather than the other way around.
Mike when the Book of Order was redone there were statements which did back up Universalism. But you should know I am no longer PCUSA and have not been for several years. I am Evangelical Presbyterian. I am in the midst of grieving for my husband who just died on March the 18th from Alzheimer's.
Post a Comment