Sunday, May 25, 2008

An Overture that reeks of apostasy


Once again Presbyterians (USA) are being asked to ‘affirm’ that Christians, Jews and Muslims worship a common God. Newton Presbytery has sent an overture to General Assembly –07-01 On Calling for Tolerance and Peaceful Relations Between the Christian and Muslim Communities. The title is perfectly acceptable but some of the recommendations are totally unacceptable. For instance recommendation 2 states:

"State that the PC(USA) affirms that Jews, Christians, and Muslims worship a common God, although each understands that God differently; and that, as children of this loving God, we share the commandments of love for God and neighbor, the requirement to care for the poor; and acknowledge Abraham as an expression of our common commitment to one God." (Emphasis mine)

The 3rd recommendation also has some problems. It is:

"Build on this understanding by calling for further dialogue among Jews, Christians, and Muslims, viewing each other as equals, and learning from one another to

· promote peace, resolve conflict;
· ensure human rights, prevent discrimination;
· develop dialogue, emphasize commonality;
· recognize differences, celebrate diversity;
· advocate justice, oppose bias." (Emphasis mine)


First of all it is true that many members of these three faiths adhere to monotheism, that is, they believe in one God. And many members also believe in a personal God and a God who reveals himself in a sacred text.

Beyond that, affirming that the Jewish people and Christians worship the same God is under most circumstances not difficult. I will explain.

The Christian sees in both the Hebrew Bible and the New Testament a God who reveals himself in Jesus Christ. As Calvin puts it the Hebrew Bible shadows forth Christ while in the NT Christ is “already come and manifested. (Institutes, Book four XIV (20) I am not saying here that the Jews believe in Jesus, but I am saying that their sacred text points to him.

This of course changes with some forms of Judaism such as P’nai Or or ALEPH Alliance for Jewish Renewal which is syncretistic, “absorbing and utilizing the spirituality of other religions and spiritual paths as well as incorporating modern psychology and philosophy. Therefore, in addition to Hasidism and Kabbalism, it encompasses elements from Sufism, Buddhism and Native American Religion …” 1

On the other hand the sacred text of Islam does not reveal Jesus Christ as very God of very God although they do speak of Jesus. The Christian does not find grounds for the deity of Christ in any part of the Qur’an and no part of the Qur’an shadows a Messiah who comes to save his people from their sins.

So to return to recommendation 2: State that the PC(USA) affirms that Jews, Christians, and Muslims worship a common God, although each understands that God differently—This overture’s recommendation suggests that our human understanding about God is the reason for our differences. That is theology from below; theology only understood on human terms. But God’s revelation has come to us in Jesus Christ who is God in the flesh, the Incarnation. We can only know God through Jesus Christ. That is not an understanding but rather revelation given from God’s side. We cannot get behind Jesus Christ to any other God. So we do not know the God of Islam. He is not our God.

And the problems with recommendation 3: emphasize commonality—Perhaps in our witness to Muslims we might want to emphasis at first what we have in common, but if we are doing this as a means of avoiding speaking of Jesus Christ and who he really is as well as his great gift of salvation: well, one remembers Peter who for a few tragic hours was unfaithful.

Celebrate diversity—this could only mean celebrating the different views of God we have. That is apostasy.

Oppose bias—if this means we are to oppose the Biblical belief that Jesus Christ is the only Lord and Savior, once again all that can be said is apostasy.

The Barmen Declaration is quite sufficient here:

"Jesus Christ, as he is testified to us in Holy Scripture, is the one Word of God, whom we are to hear, whom we are to trust and obey in life and death.

We reject the false doctrine, as through the Church could and would have to acknowledge as a source of its proclamation, apart from and besides this one Word of God, still other events and powers, figures and truths, as God’s revelation." (8.11-8.12)

Timothy George in his very helpful book Is the Father of Jesus the God of Muhammad? has a wonderful poem by Edward Shillito entitled Jesus of the Scars. The last verse is:

"The other gods were strong; but thou wast weak;
They rode, but thou didst stumble to a throne;
But to our wounds only God’s wounds can speak,
and not a god has wounds, but thou alone."


These are also words sufficient to help us offer a resounding no to such an overture.


1 Shirley Lucass, “Aleph: Alliance for Jewish Renewal, New Religions: A Guide: New Religious Movements, Sects and Alternative Spiritualities, Editor Christopher Partridge, Forward J. Gordon Melton (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2004) 117.

9 comments:

Pastor Bob said...

The same presbytery tried this two years ago. The last GA saw it for what it was and voted it down. I hope, with all the other stuff coming up, that this GA sees the same problems.

Viola Larson said...

I'm hoping too Bob. It’s telling that the recommendation isn’t just about being good neighbors to each other. Instead we are being called on to cast the proverbial pinch of incense to Caesar.

will said...

2 years ago this overture was recommended against. This year, the GAC is non-committal. ACREC endorses it. That doesn't really bode well.

Viola Larson said...

There is always, always prayer and the sovereignty of God!

Benjamin P. Glaser said...

Let us not forget that ole GWB has on a number of occasions affirmed that we all worship the same "God".

May God have mercy on our unbelieving and ignorant country.

will said...

Thanks, Viola - that's an important reminder.

Benjamin - I also have disliked GWB's references. There has to be, IMO, a better way to be tolerant - than by misrepresenting the truth.

Still - I tend to regard secular figures making claims of this kind as very different from churches doing so. Churches' very reason for existing is the proclamation of the Gospel - for them, its abandonment is a far more grievous thing.

Anonymous said...

While I agree completely with your take on this, Viola, it's hard to draw a clear line when the Book of Common Worship contains a couple of prayers that say almost the same thing. Heck, the BCW throws Siddhartha into the mix, too, as one who received a "revelation" (presumably genuine) of God.

-Andy

Christopher Drew said...

Andy-

Interesting comment. The BCW is an fascinating book. Much of it is quite good. Parts of it are mediocre at best. And there are certainly parts that are rather, uh, out there. Case in point, the prayer on p.815, "For Muslims" (prayer # 726):

"Eternal God, you are the one God to be worshiped by all [Me: So far, so good], the one called Allah by your Muslim children [Me: the word Allah is used by Arabic-speaking Christians, but here's the assumption that the same God is worshiped by both Christians and Muslims. Hmm.] Give us the grace to hear your truth in the teachings of Mohammed, the prophet [Me: Now here's something I would not have caught but for Andy's comment. Christians should seek out the truth of Jesus Christ wherever it may be found, but do Christians accept Mohammed as a prophet? How on earth did this get in here?], and to show your love as disciples of Jesus Christ, that Christians and Muslims together may serve you in faith and friendship. Amen. [Me: All well and good, but if you really don't worship the same God, you will never achieve the unity of purpose for which this final intercession was apparently written.]"

Another prayer on p. 798 "For World Religions" (prayer # 678) appears to be more or less a textbook case of syncretism creeping into the church.

I wasn't able to find an explicit reference to Siddhartha. Anyone else?

How about a prayer that Jesus Christ be revealed to our friends and enemies who subscribe to other religions "so that at the name of Jesus every knee should bend, in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father" (Phil 2:10-11 NRSV)? I guess such a prayer would be considered too "triumphalist."

I am here reminded some words written by Richard John Neuhaus in his excellent book Death On A Friday Afternoon:

"As in the past, so also today we hear Christian speak of grand missionary strategies for 'winning the world for Christ.' Such grand strategizing is often derided as 'triumphalism," and there is something to that. Or it is caricatured as a grand marketing plan for the gospel, and there is something to that, too. Yet, if the alternative to triumphalism is defeatism, there is something to be said for triumphalism ... What Christians propose to the world is who Christians propose to the world - 'Jesus Christ and him crucified.'"

Viola Larson said...

Andy & Drew,
Thank you. I didn't know that about the Book of Common Worship. So the seeds of pluralism are already planted.

Drew thank you for the Neuhaus quote--it fits, and the statement you have made is on my heart also:

"How about a prayer that Jesus Christ be revealed to our friends and enemies who subscribe to other religions "so that at the name of Jesus every knee should bend, in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father" (Phil 2:10-11 NRSV)? "

We could use some triumphalism as long as its centered in Jesus Christ.