Thursday, October 23, 2025

My Rant: Facing Lies, Facing the Church's Future

 

I’m at the moment working on another article about the suffering church looking back to the French-Indian wars and the following Revolutionary war to show the suffering of some Christian native Americans. But for a short time, I feel the need to stop and do some explanations and even rant about why I am doing what I am doing.

I have been thinking about this for a while and then I saw a small article posted by someone who used to be a friend and who is an expert on homosexuality from a biblical point of view and someone who I often defended on my blog. But I can’t defend the constant putdown of so many Christians who disagree with Trump and his administration. The insistence, in his posting, that the No King protests were funded by billionaire’s millions and that people were flown in to make crowds etc., is to use a good old-fashioned word, stupid. It was written by Ken Blackwell without any proof and posted by him. Then copied by my friend. But anyway, it caused me to write what I am going to write.

I have written before about the false prophet Julie Green and her insistence that many who disagree with Trump are enemies who well in the end be in jail or be hung, even picking on Chief Supreme Court Justice Roberts, insisting he will be jailed. She gets by with this by seemingly having God speak through her in prophecy, even calling Trump God’s beloved David. Green is an influencer and a friend with Eric Trump Jr. one of the President’s sons.  She is fairly well known by many who are involved in the Trump administration. None have ever, at least in writing to the public, denounced her insistence on the hurt to those who disagree with what is happening in our government.

At the moment I have and am terribly concerned about the actions of ICE and how they are intimidating American citizens and even refugees who have made a life in America. I am appalled at how the churches that minister to Mexican and other diverse groups are being treated. I am appalled by how many, who are followers of Jesus are ignoring that treatment.  But I am concerned for the church in the future, for their ability to withstand what is happening to our nation and our freedoms. If people like Julie Green and those who follow them have neither compassion for those, they consider enemies—they believe that those who disagree with Trump are enemies and must be jailed or even killed—where will the Church stand—will they be faithful? How will they be faithful?

That is why I am exploring the various ages and groups of Christians who have faced suffering.

To bring it back to the posting about the NO Kings, I believe we must look to all Scripture that confronts worldly sin, both those against life, against purity, those fostering lies, those slandering, those hurting the refugees, the poor and the needy. We must weep and advocate against the death of unborn babies, but also against the harm happening to the refugees. We must weep and advocate against the mutilated children because of their identity needs, but also for those who are being beaten, kidnapped and deported by ICE. How can we honor Christ when we ignore children being awakened in the middle of the night having their hands tied by masked men while they are separated from their parents?

My desire is to know how we can give comfort to the Church amid what is happening now and may happen in the future? We need the whole Scripture poured into our hearts and lives. We need to encourage each other with love. We need to let go of idolatry and cling to Jesus.

Wednesday, October 15, 2025

The Historical Suffering Church: Its Image, Its Faith Extending Over Our Tomorrows: The Huguenots of France 3

 

My husband and I used to haunt the bookstores of Berkeley. Many are gone now, but hopefully not Moe's. On one of our trips I found this wonderful old book on the Huguenots of France. The book is not the first printing but the one I own was published in 1877. The author of The Huguenots in France after the Revocation of Nantes, Samuel Smiles, was interested in both the region and the religious movement. I had said in my first posting about various Christian groups and the persecution they endured from mostly the state but also other religious groups that the Anabaptist were probably the most persecuted of the Reformation groups but at least the Huguenots are in competition.

While the Anabaptist were pacifist the Huguenots were not. Some of them, but not all, participated in the bloody religious wars that engulfed France as well as other European countries.

The Huguenots were part of the Reformed movement which began with Calvin. At the time of their movement the government was ruled by kings and Catholicism was the religion of the state. The Huguenots were prosperous farmers and businesspeople; they were also among the intellectuals of that time. Jumping ahead for just a bit, with persecution, France lost over 200, 000 of their most prosperous and industrious citizens as they fled to safer places such as Switzerland, England, and America. But in writing this I am interested in those who stayed in France and endured until freedom came.

There was often persecution of protestants in all of Europe and some controversy about a particular persecution, that is called the massacre of St. Bartholemew in Paris in 1572 where a royal wedding was used to trap some Huguenots in the city. Almost all were killed and much of the controversy is over how many were killed. Eventually some freedoms were given to the Huguenots by the Edict of Nantes but in 1685 King Louis the XIV rescinded the edict. The Revocation of Nantes made the Huguenot’s faith illegal. They could not meet for worship, nor sing the Psalms which was part of their worship. Many were forced to submit to Catholicism. And many fled, as I have written above.

At first this seemingly brought the worship, the meetings, the preaching of the Huguenots to an end. But two movements began. One was the bloody reprisals of the so called Camisards, groups of Huguenot men who went to war against the state and the catholic bishops. The groups and leaders of the Camisards in their outrage and radicalism listened to and followed those they called prophets. At first, they won many of their battles but in the end they either submitted to authorities or were tortured and killed.

The other movement consisted of pastors and preachers who yearned to bring the church members together in worship and to teach the word of God. Some of these preachers and pastors were those who had slipped out of the country but hearing how the Huguenot people had no one to shepherd them slipped back into the country. They were not without methods. Their worship was referred to as “the church in the desert.” Word would go out to a neighborhood of the meeting and one by one, in the evening, they would travel to the place of worship. Too often authorities would find out and attack the worshipers. The men would be sent to work in the galleys where they would set in the same place, rowing, eating and sleeping, as well as being whipped until they died. The women and children were sent to nunneries but often to the dungeon of a castle. And the pastor would be sometimes racked but always hung.

The churches were in such desperate conditions spiritually that their development needed to be restored. Because of the lack of Bibles both boys and girls were given chapters to memorize for their meetings. Training for pastors was usually outside. As one pastor put it:

“I have often pitched my professor’s chair,” said Court, “in a torrent underneath a rock. The sky was our roof, and the leafy branches thrown out from the crevices in the rock overhead were our canopy. There I and my student would remain for about eight days; it was our hall, our lecture room, and our study. To make the most of our time, and to practice the students properly, I gave them a text of Scripture to discuss before me—say the first eleven verses of the fifth chapter of Luke. I would afterwards propose to them some point of doctrine, some passage of Scripture, some moral precept, or sometimes I gave them some difficult passages to reconcile. After the whole had stated their views upon the question under discussion, I asked the youngest if he had anything to state against the arguments advanced; then the others were asked in turn; and after they had finished, I stated the views which I considered the most just and correct. When the more advanced students were required to preach, they mounted a particular place, where a pole had been set across some rocks in the ravine, and which for the time served for a pulpit. And when they had delivered themselves, the others were requested by turns to express themselves freely upon the subject of the sermon witch they had heard.” [i]

Eventually a seminary was founded at Lausanne. It was funded by many refugees in various countries. Even the king of England gave five-hundred guinens yearly. [ii]

The preachers traveled by night sometimes across pasture and often disguised. Eventually the worship gatherings grew even by thousands.  This led to greater persecutions since not only was there a greater awareness of the meetings but also a greater vengefulness toward leaders and the persistent faithful. One later pastor. Paul Rabaut, had to counter a desire of some to return to the time of the Camisards, those who wished to fight against their enemies. Smiles writes:

“Besides being zealous, studious, and pious, Rabaut was firm, active, shrewd, and gentle. He stood strongly upon moral force. Once, when the Huguenots had become more than usually provoked by the persecutions practiced on them, they determined to appear armed at the assembles. Rabaut peremptorily forbade it. If they persevered, he would forsake their meetings. He prevailed and they came armed with only their Bibles.”

In the end this was their usual stance against the horrific persecution they faced. Eventually the persecutions came to an end because of the work of a man who was a surprising gift to the Huguenots, Voltaire. In case you do not know who he was; he was an important philosopher and activist at the time and more importantly an atheist. Voltaire hated both the Catholic and Protestant religions. He did care a great deal about justice.

A father, Calas whose son had committed suicide was convicted of murder by Catholic leaders. It was not unusual at the time for Catholic officials to blame Protestant parents for the death of their children, insisting they had killed them to keep them from converting to Catholicism. Calas was convicted and hung. His wife and family fled to Switzerland where they met Voltaire. He became obsessed with the case; writing and speaking about Calas’ trial and death. Although already dead French officials retried him and acquitted him. The same event occurred with the last person to be sentenced to the galleys. A young man who, purposely taking his fathers place, suffering for six years was helped by Voltaire’s writing and speeches.  

While the Declaration of Rights in 1789 gave greater freedom to the Huguenots much was lost with the reign of terror. With the rise of Napolean Buonaparte Catholicism was once again established as the state religion but he also protected Protestantism. On a visit to a church in Paris, I don’t remember the name, we were given brochures and information including, information that Napolean had also given the Jews freedom of worship. [iii]

As I have been writing about various persecuted Christian groups I have searched to see if there was among them any reaction to the rise of Nazism in Europe. At first I found no information for the Huguenots but then I remembered stories about a town in France where all the citizens protected the Jews from the authorities. Concerning Le Chambon-sur-Lignon in an article on the Jewish site Forward I found an article which included this:

“Ever since the Louis XIV’s revocation in 1685 of the Edict of Nantes, which had imposed a century of religious tolerance, the low and sturdy stone houses had been a haven for the Huguenots, or French Protestants. Hunted by royal troops and hounded by Catholic inquisitors, the Huguenots nevertheless held fast to their faith. Their ministers led Sunday services in the craggy folds of the Cévennes, and their military leaders led a guerrilla war against the Bourbon battalions. As a result, even after the Revolution of 1789, which emancipated and enfranchised both them and French Jews, the Huguenots remained deeply marked by the so-called “years of the desert.”

The author,  Robert Zaretsky,  writes of a pastor, André Trocmé, a pacifist who led the area and town in saving thousands of Jews. He writes:

“Well before most of France, Trocmé and his flock in Chambon were acutely aware of the future that Vichy was preparing for the Jews. In 1940, an utterly dispirited nation had embraced Marshal Philippe Pétain, head of Vichy. Yet Trocmé kept his distance, refusing in 1940 to sign the oath of allegiance to Pétain or to sound the church bells in 1941 to mark his birthday. In these and similar cases, Trocmé avoided confronting the authorities directly: holding fast to his beliefs, but not endangering his church.

All this changed, though, when a mounting stream of Jews — in 1941 they were ordered to wear the yellow star on their outer garments — quit the Occupied Zone and began to find their way to Chambon by train.”

The article Protestant French Village That Resisted Vichy is a wonderfully  written article I leave it to the reader to read. In another article on the same site, Q & A: Why The Citizens Of A French Plateau Saved Hundreds During The Holocaust, author PJ Grisar writes:

“For centuries, its residents have taken in refugees. In the 16th century, the largely Protestant plateau sheltered its coreligionists during religious wars. Two centuries later, the population hid Catholic priests during the French Revolution’s anti-clerical Reign of Terror. In the 1930s, they accepted mothers and children fleeing the Spanish Civil War.

The community continues the tradition today with a welcome program aiding asylum-seekers from African and Eastern European countries and, recently, Syria. But the region’s most conspicuous act of sanctuary came in the 1940s, when, in the midst of Nazi deportations, the plateau’s residents provided hundreds of refugees, most of them Jewish children, with shelter, clothing, food and education.”

So, one understands that those who were so badly persecuted sheltered those who in the past had persecuted them. The persecuted Huguenots sheltered the persecuted Catholic priests. This is faithful Christianity.

But when the Son of Man comes in His glory, and all the angels with Him, then He will sit on His glorious throne

And He will put the sheep on His right and the goats on His left.
Then the King will say to those on His right, "Come, you who are blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world.
For I was hungry, and you gave me something to eat; I was thirsty, and you gave me something to drink; I was a stranger, and you invited me in; 
naked, and you clothed Me, I was sick, and you visited Me; I was in prison and you came to me
Then the righteous will answer Him, "Lord, when did we see You hungry, and feed You, or thristy, and give You something to drink? 
And when did we see You a stranger and invite You end, or naked and clothe You?
When did we see You sick, or in prison and come to You?
The King will answer and say to them, "Truly I say to you, to the extent that you did it to the one of these brothers of mine, even the least of them, you did it to Me." Matthew 25: 31, 33-40) 

[i] Samuel Smiles, The Huguenots in France: After the Revocation of the Edict of Nantes, (London: Daldy, Isbister 1877) 222.E

[ii] Ibid. 223.

[iii] To read a good book about this time of the Revolution, the reign of terror and Napolean see, Mike Duncan, Hero of Two Worlds: The Marquis da Lafayette in the Age of Revolution, (New York: Public Affairs 2021)

Monday, October 6, 2025

Stephen Miller and that Dragon...Again!




After writing about Stephen Miller’s speech at the memorial service for Charlie Kirk I have been pondering the idea, the metaphors and the reality of dragons or a dragon. Originally, I wrote about Miller’s words and their pagan-like essence when he insisted that the killing of Kirk had, “awakened a dragon in those who cared about Kirk and his mission. He spoke “You have no idea the dragon you have awakened,” Miller goes on to speak of how that will cause him and Kirk’s followers to fight for the West and save the Republic. 

A commenter on my blog took exception to my words “The book of Revelation filled with metaphors speaks of a dragon. His war isn’t good, he attempts to kill Jesus, he lives in rage and gives his power to a despotic being—he ends in hell.” 

And yes, that is both the biblical and often Western understanding of the dragon—a vile creature, greedy and seeking the death of others. Think of Saint George killing the dragon, of the boy Eustace in C. S. Lewis’ book, The Voyage of the Dawn Treader who falls asleep on a pile of gold belonging to a dead dragon and becomes a dragon. Only the Lion, Aslan, can wash him clean of the horrific skin and scales of a dragon. The first battle of a man with a dragon occurs in Beowulf, an early mythic western story. 

But the commenter is right. There are other versions of dragons, ones that might be more familiar to Miller who is Jewish. At least, probably, the New Testament image of a dragon might be new to Miller, and yet Jewish people often read the N.T. Still, even the Hebrew Bible has images of dragons which biblically simply mean serpent and/or monster. 

But yes, the dragons of the East, of Asia, are not considered evil, but wise and/or strong warriors—a creature to absorb or emulate. And there is another image that belongs to both the East and West through paganism, some “New Age,” mostly what is called tantric and the supposed kundalini (serpent) which is thought by eastern religious adherents to lie at the base of the spine and must be awakened. It is generally awakened by different technics, usually sex, directed away from fulfillment toward opening one to a deeper consciousness. But now, supposedly, more expansive than just Kundalini is “dragon kundalini” which is supposed to lead to a more universal consciousness. So yes, there is supposedly a dragon within. 

But there are several truths that go beyond any of this. There, biblically speaking, is only one dragon, serpent/monster who also goes by the moniker lucifer or Satan. (All other dragons are fairy tales, untruthful fairy tales—I am thinking of Tolkien’s On Fairy Stories, where he calls the story of Jesus a true fairy story.) The image of Lucifer in Genesis is as a serpent, a deceiver. And while in Revelation he is pictured as a great dragon ready to devour the God-man Jesus; he is also pictured as one who brings other ugly, terrifying monsters on the scene giving them his power. He is also pictured as defeated. Defeated by a cross as Jesus brings many children to glory. 

 Lucifer is defeated by the death and resurrection of Jesus. And he is defeated by the martyrs (witnesses) of Jesus. 

After these things I looked and behold a great multitude which no one could count, from every nation and all tribes and peoples and tongues standing before the throne and before the lamb, clothed in white robes, and palm branches were in their hands; and they cry out with a loud voice, saying, salvation to our God who sits on the throne, and to the Lamb. Rev 7”9-10 

Perhaps no one can save the West, particularly not someone who is metaphorically or otherwise counting on an awakened dragon. If we are overcome by a man who longs to rule and brings us down beneath a democracy—whose only desire is toward himself. If we are overcome by those whose desires bend towards power and false religion that ignores the way of the cross there is still that kingdom that is forever—not of this world but eternal—full of God’s love and forgiveness.