Anti-Jew and Israel, anti-Muslim, anti-immigrant-be careful

Sometimes interesting information just pops up when I am not expecting it. Now I am going to mention four words I just keep writing about, but this is not about them. Really. On the web site of the Israel/Palestine Mission Network (and please notice that Israel and Palestine are two words) there is another video.

The IPMN has entitled this video “Dr. Norman Finkelstein explains how the Israel/Palestine Conflict can be resolved easily.” And this one is about international law, crime and Israel and supposedly the pro- Israel, Jewish interviewer gets told off, but I will withhold my thoughts on that since that is not what my posting is about.

The actual name of the video as found all over the net is “Norman Finkelstein Interviewed on Danish TV November 13 2009.” And if you go to You-Tube you will find that every site that has this video is getting it from a posting at akawakurusa's Channel.

On this particular posting the poster offers several web sites where more information may be found. He points to Balder.org. This strange site offers a blog and different articles in several languages. But all of this comes from Denmark.

Now I will backtrack a bit. Several months ago I did some postings on a party in Britain called the British National Party. You can find the series here under The British National Party and NeoPagan Racism. Just scroll down to start at the beginning.

The BNP is a party that advocates for the white races only and this last year they won two seats in the European Parliament. In the past they have been anti-Semitic but generally they are an anti-immigration party. And they are now known for being very anti-Muslim.

There is now the rise of political parties and movements that are, anti-immigration, anti-Semitic and anti-Muslim. And the You-Tube site where the video, “Norman Finkelstein Interviewed on Danish TV November 13 2009” can be found is a part of the movement as is Balder.org.

Hopefully the readers remember when I did my series on the BNP I likened some of their ideas to the racist Asatru and Odinist groups which attempt to return to ancient pagan tribes and hold race as intrinsic to their religion. I incorporated another article, “The NeoPagan Movement and Racism” I wrote several years ago into my article on the BNP.

I noticed when exploring the You-Tube site that one of the comments left there was “Hail the nordic tribes.” This is a movement with layers and layers of racism. Some layers are blatant other layers more subtle.

So here is a word of warning to any Christian, myself included. There are some very dark movements rising in our present world. They hate the Jews and Israel, hate the Muslims, hate the immigrant, hate anyone who is not white or western. So we must all be careful from where we pull information. That is why the word of God and its authority in our lives is so important. That is why Jesus Christ the rock we stand on is ultimate.

Some people accidently started following Hitler in the 1930’s. Martin Niemöller was at first enthralled with Hitler. He felt that Hitler would bring morality back to Germany. When he learned the truth about the Nazis and Hitler he became their archenemy. He became the hated personal prisoner of Hitler. Some followed Hitler because they thought he was God’s gift to Germany. They never wavered-they followed him into hell.

The only safe place is under the Lordship of Jesus Christ.

The British National Party and racist Neo-Paganism: is there common ground? 6

I began this series of posts with the assumption that the British National Party could be partly evaluated by looking at some of its similarities with some racists Asatru and Odinist groups. And it is in the area of culture and the value the groups have for their culture that the similarities can be seen. This is an important issue because many groups, both left and right, are giving extreme value to the concept of culture. Picture by Stephen Larson

When a group begins to connect culture to genetics, or to see divine revelation in culture, at least for Christians, great problems arise. God has given his written word and the living Word, Jesus Christ that we might know who God is. The first Commandment demands that nothing else may be put either above or even beside God. That includes a glorified culture.

As I have pointed out in earlier posts both the racist Asatru groups and the British National Party connect white culture genetically to their groups. The Asatru therefore connects heathenism to themselves believing it is the rightful religion of the Northern white people. But what about the BNP? Is Christianity the genetically correct religion for them?

There is a web site for what is called the Christian Council of Britain. This was supposedly not connected to the BNP however a blogger did some research and found that both web sites have the same web master. Also the only political party espoused by the CCB is the BNP. Beyond that the CCB web site has been up for a year and has not had its informational pages completed. However there is enough information to help the reader understand what religious concepts are important to the CCB as well as the BNP.

When first encountering several faith statements and ancient creeds one thinks, ah a truly Christian site. Yet there are problems and once again they are connected to the concept of culture and culture as the essence of the people. They write, “For nearly two thousand years, the faith has moulded our national psyche and spirit, defining our values toward life itself; our families, neighbours, animals, the natural environment and the wider society.

While the statements about membership are clear as far as what a Christian is, yet the information states, “Members of the Council can be either Christians who accept and acknowledge the Trinity, or simply people who may not be believing Christians but who still value and wish to uphold the Christian heritage of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

So a Christian council may have unbelievers as long as they value the Christian heritage of the United Kingdom and Northern Ireland. Here heritage plays an important part and is linked only to that heritage that belongs to Britain.

The council is there to defend the morality of Britain and here and there they list problems that most conservative, orthodox and evangelical Christians would be concerned with, for instance abortion and homosexuality. But it is their inclusion of race and state, (blood and soil) that puts them outside the boundaries of Christianity.

Their constitution states as one of their principles:

"The Gift of Race and Nation. The Christian Council of Great Britain and Northern Ireland resolved that it recognises that all men are of one blood (or proto-race) in Adam through to Noah; and that from that one proto-race divergent races have historically devolved - Russian doll-like - (Genesis 11: 1-9) so that we are now different, though related, races and nations of men, all of whom God has made (Psalms 86: 9); which are each to bring their own distinctive glory into the kingdom of God (Revelation 21: 26). The Christian Council of Great Britain and Northern Ireland therefore resolved to recognise the godly importance of race and nation as groups based on this historical and providential process of objective descent: giving rise to different organically-formed communities; sharing and passing-on common genetically inherited (physical, intellectual and character) features together with cultures, mores, relationships, loyalties, memories, and identities in common; and ultimately - by the will of God - national homelands (Genesis 10:5, 20,31,32) where an ongoing connection between land and people has developed and can be encouraged and preserved (Acts 17: 26). The Christian Council of Great Britain and Northern Ireland recognises these facts and privileges, especially with regard to the historic British people whose land this is. The Christian Council of Great Britain and Northern Ireland therefore resolved especially to welcome the British as such a People, and as individuals, into membership.(Bold mine)

Before going further I should state that none of the Bible verses in this statement have anything to do with what the statement actually says. And further this statement is not much different than some produced by the German Christians, those who were for Nazism, in the time of Hitler. For instance this is the words of the Rengsdorf Theses written by a conference of German Christians.

“There is not a ‘universal Christianity.’ Christianity as such is an unreal abstraction. For a German [read a white British citizen here] there can be only a Christianity rooted in the German Nationality.”

Karl Barth had an answer for all of the statements in these theses. For this one he wrote:

“The genuine particularity and concreteness of ‘Christianity’ on the ground of German nationality is not to be derived from what we know about this ground, but it is to be accepted as that form in which one commandment and the one comfort of the Word is revealed to us upon this ground according to its own wisdom and will.

Whoever preaches today ‘a Christianity rooted in German nationality’ binds God’s Word to an arbitrarily conceived Weltanschauung [World View], thereby invalidating it, and places himself outside the evangelical Church.”

In other words, insisting that the good news of Jesus Christ’s life, death and resurrection share its importance with our own ethnic group or nationality puts us outside the evangelical Church. So no matter any of the issues promoted by the BNP or the CCB their religion is not centered in the Lordship of Jesus Christ and instead in blood and soil.

The British National Party and racist Neo-Paganism: is there common ground? 5

This morning I went to the farmers market, the one in South Sacramento. I love going there for more than just the fresh vegetables and brown eggs; I love the wonderful sights and sounds of the many different ethnic groups who both sell and buy there.

-

The Indian women in their beautiful saris and the Sikh men with their colorful turbans mix with various Asian people, African Americans and Hispanic people as well as those of my ancestry who could probably be called Anglo-Saxon, Celtic or maybe even Normans and/or Picts! Various languages can be heard as the sounds intermingle. And as I listened I couldn’t help thinking of the subject I have been writing about, the British National Party.

This British political party, which is racist, has some traits akin to the Nazis. Their manifesto for the 2005 elections which I wrote about yesterday shows some of the same interests covering such subjects as the celebration of ancient festivals to “proper” architect to hatred for both Marxism and Capitalism. Their Constitution shows their deep roots in totalitarianism.

The Pagan Past: The picture above is from Nazi Culture, by George L Mosse. It is a picture of young women supposedly dressed as Bronze Age women. This kind of activity, including the celebration of ancient Germanic festivals, was encouraged by the Nazis as a means of reinforcing the importance of German Culture. The Asatru groups close to Sacramento not only incorporate such rites and festivals in their own religion they make use of other non-religious Northern European activities. And the BNP is also encouraging building connections to ancient British culture.

Under the sub-title “Art and Culture,” they write, “Schools in England will be encouraged to celebrate May Day and other ancient festivals, whilst the other folk nations of the British Isles will be encouraged to resurrect their ancestral folk traditions.” The document states that those with a “foreign” ethnic background would be encouraged to study their own traditions but this would be in different and non-public schools.

The importance of this link with fascism and Nazism seems trivial but it is not when linked with policies that encourage all ethnic groups but those that are white to leave Britain. It should also be pointed out that while BNP seemingly supports Christianity they are taking very definite measures to link with Britain’s pagan past by celebrating pagan holidays in the schools.

Totalitarianism: The Constitution of the BNP lays out an extreme hierarchical structure for government within the party, with the National Chairman acting as an absolute ruler, including, “Power to determine, and where necessary change, all organizational structures within the party, and to determine all rules and procedures whereby such structures are governed. Also, the National Chairman has, “Power to determine all routine executive, administrative, policy and tactical decisions made by the party.” While there are other countless rules, a Chairman with that kind of authority can change any of them.

Both Capitalism and Marxism as enemy: A constant tirade against both Capitalism and Marxism is characteristic of fascist literature. In an article written in 1932 by Joseph Goebbels, the Nazi Minister of Propaganda, he constantly fires at both forms of economics lifting up National Socialism as the ideal solution. He writes:

“If a Communist shouts "Down with nationalism!", he means the hypocritical bourgeois patriotism that sees the economy only as a system of slavery. If we make clear to the man of the left that nationalism and capitalism, that is the affirmation of the Fatherland and the misuse of its resources, have nothing to do with each other, indeed that they go together like fire and water, then even as a socialist he will come to affirm the nation, which he will want to conquer.” (Bold Goebbels)

The BNP in their Manifesto does the same, blaming the “problem” of having a multi-cultural society which they see in turn as causing the death of distinctive British languages such as Gaelic and Welsh on Capitalism. They write: The poison is in large measure the blind economic force of global capitalism, with its insistence on the unrestricted flow of goods, capital and labour to wherever in the world they will make the maximum shot-term profit.”

Anti-Semitism: The most telling similarity between Fascism, Nazism and the BNP would be anti-Semitism. While this can be clearly shown in the history of the BNP at the moment it is partially dormant and instead a strong dislike for Islam replaces it.

However it is not completely dormant. In the 2005 Manifesto, toward the end, when writing of Britain’s relationship with the United States and the armed conflicts going on in several countries, the authors write, “We are utterly opposed to attempts by American imperialists, the Zionist lobby, the neo-con movement and the US’s British puppets in the Labour and Tory parties to drag us into a ‘Clash of Civilisations’ with the Islamic world. (Emphasis mine)

The last subject here is important. In a later posting I will detail the history of the BNP and anti-Semitism. Another important issue is the BNP and Christianity. A later posting well also address that subject.

-

To end this posting, when doing research on Nazism and the BNP I discovered an essay in a book I have owned for quite awhile. It is the book mentioned above, Nazi Culture. The essay was written by Inge Scholl the sister of Sophie Scholl the young woman martyred because of her participation in the Nazi resistance movement, The White Rose. A movie was made about her in 2005. The essay is mostly about the brother Hans who was also martyred.

-

The essay is about how the brother was at first enthusiastic about Hitler and the Nazi party because he thought it was about loving Germany. He found instead that it was 'only' about loving Germany, and that as one loves an idol.

-

His sister tells how as an enthusiastic Hitler youth camper he taught the young men he was in charge of folk songs, singing and playing his guitar. The problem? The songs were from many other lands and cultures. He was finally forbidden to do so. He had heard his father call the Nazis wolves and beasts, and in the end he would find that it was true.

The British National Party and racist Neo-Paganism: is there common ground? 4

In my last posting on the British National Party I focused on their racism and how it was similar to those Asatru and Odinist groups that are racist. I will continue in this posting with that theme, and I will also go deeper into the plan the BNP has for eliminating nonwhite ethnic groups from Britain.

I decided to continue this theme because of some extra material I have that was produced by the BNP in the 2005 elections. It is titled “Rebuilding British Democracy: Manifesto.” Although the web page of the BNP has several manifestos they do not have this one posted.

This is a very large paper with 53 pages and within those pages the racism of BNP is clearly spelled out.

Explaining the BNP’s position on human equality, the authors of the Manifesto write, “We do not accept the absurd superstition-propagated for different though sometimes overlapping reasons by capitalists, liberals, Marxists and theologians-of human equality." They expand on their thoughts not by examining the general idea of equality as in granting to each individual equal rights but instead by looking at the differences in individuals. The error is then compounded by an attempt to make a case for genetic differences in different ethnic groups.

And here Asatru and Steven McNallen’s religious view of race finds its counterpart in an ill defined and misunderstood view of a new genetic method of testing drug safety for various peoples. The authors of the Manifesto write:

“This must not be taken to mean or imply that we believe that any particular ethnic group or race is ‘superior’ or inferior’; we simply recognize that-as any biologist would be able to predict, and the new medical science of pharmacogenetics is now confirming-human populations which have undergone micro-evolutionary changes while being separated for many thousands of years have developed differences in many fields of endeavour, susceptibility to health problems, behavioural tendencies and such like.
. . .
Taking these facts into account, we believe that it is far more likely than not that the historically established tendency … of the peoples of Western Europe in general-and of these islands in particular-to create and sustain social and political structures in which individual freedom, equality before the law, private property and popular participation in decision making, is to some extent at least genetically pre-determined. Such tendencies would naturally, both shape our culture around such institutions, and in turn tend to be reinforced by that culture.” (p.17) (Bold mine)

In other words, according to this racist document, white individuals have a genetic disposition to form more democratic and free societies than other ethnic groups. One wonders what ethnic group the writers of this document, who do not believe in human equality, belong to? But they do have a plan for ridding the white British people of the other ethnic groups.

They write not only of sending the illegal immigrant back to their homeland, of not only encouraging the legal immigrant to return to their homeland by promising them money, they also want to encourage the descendents of the immigrant to return to their parent's or grandparent's homeland. In other words if the people are not white it would be a good idea, according to these authors to send them away.

They write: We will end immigration to the UK and reduce our land’s population burden by creating firm but voluntary incentives for immigrants and their descendents to return home.” (48) They also, earlier, write under ten proposals, “A massively-funded and permanent programme, using and doubling Britain’s current foreign aid budget, will aim to reduce, by voluntary resettlement to their lands of origin, the proportion of ethnic minorities living in Britain, for as the majority of the electorate are willing to fund such expenditure.”(21)

Much of this racism is also formed out of a twisted understanding of multi-culturalism and diversity. The writers of the document believe that multi-culturalism kills diversity, that diversity is only maintained in separateness. So, while in just a few minor places, the document tries to affirm a cultural kind of Christianity, it is void of biblical Christianity which understands that those who are in Christ are one no matter their ethnicity.

As I read this document I have noted many sign posts to fascism and even to the ideology of the Nazis. I will write about their similarites to facism and the Nazis in my next posting.

The British National Party and racist Neo-Paganism: is there common ground? 3

In my last posting, The British National Party and racist Neo-Paganism: is there common ground? 2, I finished the article on Neo-Paganism and racism. I now will look at the similarities between the British National Party and racist Asatru and Odinist groups. Pictures by Stephen Larson

The British National Party, which won two seats in the European Parliament just two weeks ago, has one particularly strong similarity to racist neo-pagan groups. And it should be pointed out that its similarity is politically very dangerous in regards to democracy. It is a racism that tries to eliminate the very definition of both racism and democracy.

In the article I posted I looked at Steve McNallen’s religious view of race which he refers to as “Metagenetics.” He wrote, “We are intimately tied up with the fate of our whole people, for Asatru is an expression of the soul of our race.” Because of this view only the white race is allowed to belong to such religious groups. And although this is supposedly a religious view it nonetheless fits precisely the demands of the BNP’s qualifications for belonging to their political party.

In the Constitution of the BNP they state:

"The British National Party represents the collective National, Environmental, Political, Racial, Folkish, Social, Cultural, Religious and Economic interests of the indigenous Anglo-Saxon, Celtic and Norse folk communities of Britain and those we regard as closely related and ethnically assimilated or assimilable aboriginal members of the European race also resident in Britain. Membership of the BNP is strictly defined within the terms of, and our members also self define themselves within, the legal ambit of a defined ‘racial group’ this being ‘Indigenous Caucasian’ and defined ‘ethnic groups’ emanating from that Race as specified in law in the House of Lords case of Mandla V Dowell Lee (1983) 1 ALL ER 1062, HL.

2) The indigenous British ethnic groups deriving from the class of ‘Indigenous Caucasian’ consist of members of: i) The Anglo-Saxon Folk Community; ii) The Celtic Scottish Folk Community; iii) The Scots-Northern Irish Folk Community; iv) The Celtic Welsh Folk Community; v) The Celtic Irish Folk Community; vi) The Celtic Cornish Folk Community; vii) The Anglo-Saxon-Celtic Folk Community; viii) The Celtic-Norse Folk Community; ix) The Anglo-Saxon-Norse Folk Community; x) The Anglo-Saxon-Indigenous European Folk Community; xi) Members of these ethnic groups who reside either within or outside Europe but ethnically derive from them.(Ninth Edition)"

BNP’s attempts to define democracy and racism are much like the words from Animal Farm about all animals being equal but some being more equal than others. On racism they, like McNallen, keep insisting that if their party respects other ethnic groups, but insist they stay within their own communities and/or countries, they are not racists. However as one begins to read some of their policy statements extreme ideas emerge.

For instance their statement about immigration begins with views that simply sound very conservative but as it progresses one is reminded of long lines of trains headed for concentration camps. Their statement:

“To ensure that this does not happen [the white population becoming the minority], and that the British people retain their homeland and identity, we call for an immediate halt to all further immigration, the immediate deportation of criminal and illegal immigrants, and the introduction of a system of voluntary resettlement whereby those immigrants who are legally here will be afforded the opportunity to return to their lands of ethnic origin assisted by a generous financial incentives both for individuals and for the countries in question.”

The BNP also has a system for answering questions about racism. In their leaflet "Language discipline" they state, “The precisely correct description of what we are, in the standard terminology of international comparative politics, is a ‘patriotic’ or ‘ethno-nationalist’ party. That is, we espouse, like many political parties all over the world, the interests of the particular ethnic groups to which we belong.” The BNP goes on to redefine the difference between the rights of other ethnicities and the rights of Caucasian peoples.

The leaflet suggests that party members when speaking of none white groups define ethnicity in both the civic and ethnic ways. This means that all other ethnic groups have the rights and duties of citizenship but that only the white groups have the right of staying in the majority as far as population is concerned.

As the author puts it, “This ethnic understanding of Britishness does not impinge upon the civic rights of British passport holders. It is merely an expression of the rights of an indigenous people to be recognised as such, and to have the right to remain as the majority population in their own nation.” This is simply a ruse. If one is a citizen of Britain, one is a citizen of Britain. The right of fecundity belongs to all ethnic groups.

As a matter of fact a rule listed above this double citizenship one helps the reader understand the apparent racism in any of the rules. It is, “Explanations of our ideology should be couched, whenever possible, in terms of specifically British history and the specific national identity of Britain. For example, when discussing rights, we should speak of‘our traditional rights’ or ‘the rights of Englishmen’, not about universal human rights, which is a very different concept.” (Bold original)

The racism of the BNP is blatant but there are other subjects related to racism. This particular political party has a totalitarian bent which is not unlike past totalitarian political parties of the twentieth century. Also there are other connections, such as books and ancient pre-Christian history, which once again reflect the racist paganism of some Asatru and Odinist groups. I will explore these various subjects in following postings.

In my last posting, The British National Party and racist Neo-Paganism: is there common ground? 2, I finished the article on Neo-Paganism and racism. I now will look at the similarities between the British National Party and racist Asatru and Odinist groups.


The British National Party, which won two seats in the European Parliament just two weeks ago, has one particularly strong similarity to racist neo-pagan groups. And it should be pointed out that its similarity is politically very dangerous in regards to democracy. It is a racism that tries to eliminate the very definitions of both racism and democracy.


In the article I posted I looked at Steve McNallen’s religious view of race which he refers to as “Metagenetics.” He wrote, “We are intimately tied up with the fate of our whole people, for Asatru is an expression of the soul of our race.” Because of this view only the white race is allowed to belong to such religious groups. And although this is supposedly a religious view it nonetheless fits precisely the demands of the BNP’s qualifications for belonging to their political party.


In the Constitution of the BNP they state:

The British National Party represents the collective National, Environmental, Political, Racial, Folkish, Social, Cultural, Religious and Economic interests of the indigenous Anglo-Saxon, Celtic and Norse folk communities of Britain and those we regard as closely related and ethnically assimilated or assimilable aboriginal members of the European race also resident in Britain. Membership of the BNP is strictly defined within the terms of, and our members also self define themselves within, the legal ambit of a defined ‘racial group’ this being ‘Indigenous Caucasian’ and defined ‘ethnic groups’ emanating from that Race as specified in law in the House of Lords case of Mandla V Dowell Lee (1983) 1 ALL ER 1062, HL.

2) The indigenous British ethnic groups deriving from the class of ‘Indigenous Caucasian’ consist of members of: i) The Anglo-Saxon Folk Community; ii) The Celtic
Scottish Folk Community; iii) The Scots-Northern Irish Folk Community; iv) The
Celtic Welsh Folk Community; v) The Celtic Irish Folk Community; vi) The Celtic
Cornish Folk Community; vii) The Anglo-Saxon-Celtic Folk Community;viii The Celtic-Norse Folk Community; ix) The Anglo-Saxon-Norse Folk Community; x) The
Anglo-Saxon-Indigenous European Folk Community; xi) Members of these ethnic
groups who reside either within or outside Europe but ethnically derive from them.(Ninth Edition)

BNP’s attempts to define democracy and racism are much like the words from Animal Farm about all animals being equal but some being more equal than others. On racism they, like McNallen, keep insisting that if their party respects other ethnic groups, but insist they stay within their own communities and/or countries, they are not racists. However as one begins to read some of their policy statements extreme ideas emerge.
For instance their statement about immigration begins with views that simply sound very conservative but as it progresses one is reminded of long lines of trains headed for concentration camps. Their statement:
“To ensure that this does not happen [the white population becoming the minority], and that the British people retain their homeland and identity, we call for an immediate halt to all further immigration, the immediate deportation of criminal and illegal immigrants, and the introduction of a system of voluntary resettlement whereby those immigrants who are legally here will be afforded the opportunity to return to their lands of ethnic origin assisted by a generous financial incentives both for individuals and for the countries in question.”
The BNP also has a system for answering questions about racism. In their leaflet “Language discipline,” they state, “The precisely correct description of what we are, in
the standard terminology of international comparative politics, is a ‘patriotic’ or
‘ethno-nationalist’ party. That is, we espouse, like many political parties all over
the world, the interests of the particular ethnic groups to which we belong.” The BNP goes on to redefine the difference between the rights of other ethnicities and the rights of Caucasian peoples.

The leaflet suggests that party members when speaking of none white groups define ethnicity in both the civic and ethnic ways. This means that all other ethnic groups have the rights and duties of citizenship but that only the white groups have the right of staying in the majority as far as population is concerned. As the author puts it, “This ethnic understanding of Britishness does not impinge upon the civic rights of British passport holders. It is merely an expression of the rights of an indigenous people to be recognised as such, and to have the right to remain as
the majority population in their own nation.” This is simply a ruse. If one is a citizen of Britain, one is a citizen of Britain. The right of fecundity belongs to all ethnic groups.

As a matter of fact a rule listed above this double citizenship one helps the reader understand the apparent racism in any of the rules. It is, “Explanations of our ideology should be couched, whenever possible, in terms of specifically British history and the specific national identity of Britain. For example, when discussing rights, we should speak of‘our traditional rights’ or ‘the rights of Englishmen’, not about universal human rights, which is a very different concept.” (Bold original)

The racism of the BNP is blatant but there are other subjects related to racism. This particular political party has a totalitarian bent which is not unlike past totalitarian political parties of the twentieth century. Also there are other connections, such as books and ancient pre-Christian history, which once again reflex the racist paganism of some Asatru and Odinist groups. I will explore these various subjects in following postings.

The British National Party and racist Neo-Paganism: is there common ground? 2

The second half of “The NeoPagan Movement and Racism.”

Ethnic Religion and Religious Hatred

These various Odin groups make a distinction between a universal religion and an ethnic or “folkish” faith. All of the major world religions are considered universal because they are meant for all people. The ethnic religion is understood as existing only for a racial or cultural group. In this context Christianity is seen as the great enemy of the white Northern peoples since they were converted by its missionaries to an alien religion not in keeping with the soul of the Northern European. Picture by Stephen Larson

Michael Moynihan in his book, Lords of Chaos: The Bloody Rise of the Satanic Metal Underground, subtly implies that the many church burnings in Norway by either band members or fans of black metal was a subconscious explosion of the white youths need to return to the old heathen religions. He documents how many of these members turned from satanic rock to the Norse or Odin religious symbols in their music and religious outlook. One explanation that Moynihan offers is Jungian and builds on a theory of racial archetypes within the cultural subconscious.6 So along side the racial problem in these groups is the glaring problem of religious hatred.

There are several degrees of extremism among such pagan groups on the Internet. The most extreme and the racist ones are The Pagan Front and The Heathen Front. Another grouping made up of such groups as Asatru Free Assembly, Asatru Folk Assembly and Odinic Rite, do not consider themselves racist and have nothing to do with Hitler or Nazism. (Interestingly, the latter groups see Hitler and Nazism as manifestly Christian, and therefore atrocious, while Pagan Front and Heathen Front see Hitler and Nazism as anti-Christian and therefore an admirable and helpful part of their movement. They all quote Hitler to prove their point!)

While Steve McNallen of Asatru Folk Assembly claims not to be racist, some of his articles promote racism. In an article entitled “Wotan vs. Tezcatlipoca,” McNallen attempts to show that a kind of spiritual ethnic war is developing in California between the gods of the Hispanic culture and the European culture.

He sees the old Aztec and Mayan gods pushing for territory in California and writes, “If California and the American Southwest are to be cultural battlegrounds, who better to lead the European-American counterattack against Tonatzin and Tezcatlipoca than our own Gods of the North.” While not suggesting violence as the answer, he sees cultural interests such as language and festivals as indicators of aggression rather than celebrations of ethnic diversity in a democracy. 8

The Heathen Front, unlike the Pagan Front, does not major in Black Metal music. Not unlike Nazi culture, they value ethnic folk music and the classical music of Richard Wagner.7 However, the founder of the Norwegian Heathen Front, musician Varg Vikernes, is a young man serving a prison term in Norway for murder and church burnings. Before his imprisonment he was a part of the Black Metal and Satanic Music scene in Norway. He is also one of the more important subjects in Moynihan's book Lords of Chaos.

Moynihan explains that Vikernes is an embarrassment to the neo-heathen groups because of his “extreme and bloody interpretation of indigenous Norse religion.” Moynihan also writes, “when contemporary figures sought to revive the old religion of Northern Europe, they had not intended to bring back uncontrollable barbarism and lawlessness with it.”9

Several other interests connect these groups to the pagan worldview and to grass roots movements in general. One interest is the tribal unit versus globalism. Since the tribe is seen as the most important unit of society in the Odin communities, neither nation states, world organizations, nor any form of global movement are accepted as helpful to the white European soul. Another interest is the environment. They affirm environmental concerns and have statements at their websites about environmental issues as they see them.

The Heathen Front offers an essay on Savitri Devi. She was a vegetarian and advocate for animal rights. Her book, Impeachment of Man, is an attack on Christianity, Judaism and Islam and a plea for the rights of animals. A European, she lived in India during World War II, aligning herself with the Nazi Party and the radical India Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS). She later developed connections to George Lincoln Rockwell the founder of the American Nazi Party. 10

The Heathen Front also states:

"Judeo-christian [sic] morals prevent mother Jord from doing her work, so we are keeping people alive that were sacrificed by nature to save those fit for survival. More people means [sic] more pollution, and today we have reached too high a level of population/pollution. The earth can no longer re-generate. Slowly we are killing everyone to help just a few. If you look upon this matter with a clear vision, rather than one blurred with Judeo-Christian or humanist values, you will understand this fully as well."11

The religious hatred of these various groups is one of the more troubling aspects of the movement. On Pagan Front's website various band's sites are promoted. One site has two crosses inverted with Christ still hanging there as an entryway. Varg Vikernes in an article denouncing “Christian Identity,” (a racist movement claiming to be Christian), calls Christianity the “most extreme Jewish consequence.”

Later in the article, he states, “It were [sic] Christians who condemned everything Aryan to Hell forever! It was Christianity who made our Aryan race coward and degenerate! Christianity has been the origin of everything evil in Europe since it arrived here!”12 In an article about ecology, the writer states, “Judeo-Christianity is the irreligious masquerading as the religious. It is a life hating death cult, that hates the earth with its races, its tribes and its wide biological variety - its underlying holiness.”13

A Biblical Response: God's Blessing From Tribe to Messiah to the Nations
Humanly speaking, the Judeo-Christian world will cringe at this hatefulness, and rightfully so. Yet, prayerfully, there is another picture of the individuals in these groups. Born into a Western “Christian” culture where most people are biblically illiterate and where materialistic secularism has almost totally engulfed society, they generally know nothing of the gospel of Jesus Christ. They equate “Christian” with the emptiness of secular society. Racists neo-pagans experience a society filled with barren hype, little meaning and violence. They believe that within their pagan racial beliefs they have returned home: to nature and to the tribe.

But such groups have the foundation for meaning inverted. It begins not with humanity, not with the alleged racial archetypes of human consciousness, but with the compassionate Father, the true Creator of all. And while the story of redemption, which gives meaning, begins with a small Near Eastern tribe, it is proclaimed and pushed forward toward all humanity; it is expanded as God speaks through the voice of the prophets of that tribe.

God's promises came to Abraham the father of that tribe, “and in you all the families of the earth will be blessed” (Gen. 12:3b). God chose that small family to bring a blessing on all the peoples of earth. The Hebrew prophets reminded the nation, who grew from that particular family, of God's desire for redemption and blessings on all people. Israel will be “a light of the nations.” God's house, “will be called a house of prayer for all the peoples.” God will bring the foreigner, those who are not Israel, “and make them joyful in My house of prayer” (Isa. 49:6b; 56:7).

God would do this through the coming Messiah who would be a light to the Gentiles: “The people who walk in darkness will see a great light; those who live in a dark land, the light will shine on them” (Isa. 9:2 with Luke 2:32). Finally, because of the Messiah's death on a cross and His resurrection, the beautiful song of the elders can be sung:

“by your blood you ransomed for God saints from every tribe and language and people and nation; you have made them to be a kingdom and priests serving our God and they will reign on earth” (Rev. 5:9, 10b).

God starts with the small, the particular, and the isolated. He moves to embrace all in His redemption. The men and women who find inspiration in an empty snowy wood, lofty mountain peaks, tales of brave warriors and mythic sagas, will in the end find only emptiness and horror if they miss the God who created not only the snowy woods, but also all the tribes of the earth.

Moynihan's remark about “uncontrollable barbarism and lawlessness” being an unintentional result of a revival of Northern European Paganism, is simply one case in point. Jesus Christ is the only revelation of God; any other leads to destruction. Unredeemed humanity moves toward the horror and corruption of nightmares. All that is good and promising, “the weight of glory” as C.S. Lewis called it, comes from Jesus Christ.

Notes

6 Michael Moynihan, Didrik Soderlind, Lords of Chaos: The Bloody Rise of the Satanic Metal Underground, (Vince, California: Feral House 1998). Michael Moynihan is himself a member of “the Tribe of the Wulfings,”(see “Lords of Chaos: A Review by Hnikar) Hnikar, (Eric Wood), has left the Asatru Folk Assembly and has removed all of his articles from the internet but the papers are on file at Naming The Grace. Moynihan has a band called Blood Axis. He belongs to those groups that disavow racism but who hold a potential for racism.

7 What is AHF? Frequently Asked Questions, On file.

8 Stephen A. McNallen, Asatru Folk Assembly, “Wotan vs. Tezcatlipoca: The Spiritual War For California and The Southwest, http://www.runestone.org/articles/wotanvstezcat.htm

9 Moynihan, Lords of Chaos, 182.

10 Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke, Hitler's Priestess: Savitri Devi, the Hindu-Aryan Myth, and Neo-Nazism, (New York: New York University Press 1998), 104,105. Savitri Devi is rejected by some Odinist because of her embrace of Hinduism.

11 What is AHF? Frequently Asked Questions. On file.

12 Varg Vikernes, On File.

13 Oswin OR, “Deep Ecology and Odinism,” On File.

The British National Party and racist Neo-Paganism: is there common ground? 1

On Friday the 12th, Church and World. com (Presbyweb)was linked to a story in Christian Today about the British National Party which recently won two seats in the European Parliament. The BNP is a racist political party with some similarities to other totalitarian groups. They of course insist they are not racist. Hans Cornelder of Church and World also linked to their web site.Picture by Stephen Larson

While exploring the site I noted that their main ideology is not unlike that of some pagan groups I have written about who insist that all ethnic groups should be respected but all should keep to their own communities. I was interested enough in the similarities that I put both of their names together into Google. I came up with additional information on the racist pagan movement.

I decided to post a series; the first part will be an article I have already written, titled, “The NeoPagan Movement and Racism.” I will post this article first for two reasons. The most important reason is because it will be a guide for understanding the racism of the BNP. The second reason is because I discovered a movie is being made, by 2010, using the main book that I used for my research for the article.

The book is Lords of Chaos: The Bloody Rise of the Satanic Metal Underground, written by Michael Moynihan and Didrik Soderlind. One of the main persons in the book is “Varg Vikernes.” He served "a prison term in Norway for murder and church burnings. Before his imprisonment he was part of the Black Metal and Satanic Music scene in Norway.” The book was horrific; I can only guess that the movie will be also. So here is the first part of “The NeoPagan Movement and Racism” before I begin writing about the BNP.

The NeoPagan Movement and Racism

In the aftermath of the fall of the Berlin wall I remember listening to an interview with Henry Kissinger. The interviewer asked Mr. Kissinger if he feared a re-united Germany and a renewed Nazi movement? He replied that history does not perfectly repeat itself, but he did fear the rise of a new Romantic Movement. I believe that fear is well founded when focused on the dark side of Romanticism. Kissinger doubtless recognized the racist sentiments that can emerge out of the Romantic worldview. This article will explore the relationship between racism and some Neo-Pagan groups who are a part of a new Romantic Movement. I will point out the blatant racism of some groups and will explore the potential racism in other groups that disavow racism. I will also explore the hatred these groups hold for Jews and Christians, and I will give a biblical perspective and response to such hatred.

Understanding Romantic Movements
Romantic movements generally include a wide assortment of thinkers since such movements are in many ways a reaction against empiricism and materialism. Several of the more articulate Christian apologists of the last century could be considered Romantics. C.S. Lewis and J.R.R. Tolkien as well as most of the Inklings were Romantics in much of their view of life and in their writings. They were, however, Romantics with a Christian worldview and there are three distinctions to be made.

First, Romantics, who see the sublime, mystery and meaning in the natural world, often equate God with nature and for that reason are pantheists (God is all) or panentheists (God is in all). In contrast, Romantics who are Christians understand that God is the creator of everything and not a part of the world.

Second, some Romantics equate God or their own particular ethnic essence with folk tradition, cultural myths and homeland. Both Lewis and Tolkien valued folk tradition, cultural myths and the love of homeland, but they did not place such weighty significance on them. Third, some Romantics make no distinction between good and evil since both are a part of nature. In fact, some even glorify evil.

Christian Romantics understand evil as both personal and part of the fall of humanity. They, perhaps more than anyone, understand the dark dimensions of evil and they do not glorify wickedness. They see evil and good as progressive, moving in extreme opposite directions. Lewis makes such a distinction in his essay “The Weight of Glory.” He admonishes the reader “to remember that the dullest and most uninteresting person you can talk to may one day be a creature which, if you saw it now, you would be strongly tempted to worship, or else a horror and a corruption such as you now meet, if at all, only in a nightmare.”

A New Romantic Movement
Several cultural pointers provide evidence that a new Romantic Movement is in progress. A growing interest in medieval and mythical subjects in books and movies is one indicator. A growing movement of smaller ethnic-centered groups in place of a more homogenized society is another indicator. The Green Movement, with a greater concern and priority for nature rather than industry or science, is also a part of a Romantic worldview. Certainly, the New Age movement and a growing pagan community are the products of a romantic attitude toward life, community and the universe in general.

As stated, many of those who could be considered a part of the New Romantic Movement are members of the neopagan community. A small percentage of the neopagan movement is racist. Most of the racist groups belong to Odinist communities. They may also be called Ásatrú. (However, not all Odinists or Ásatrú adherents are racist.)

All of the groups I will consider in this article are made up of white European descendents; they purposely exclude all other ethnic groups. Their religious focus is on the gods and goddesses of old European tribes. (These include, Odin, who is also called Woden, Thor, Frigga, the wife of Odin and Freya.) Many Odinists see the gods and goddesses of their religion as archetypes or expressions of the racial subconscious. But there are many ways of understanding the multitude of gods and goddesses worshiped by the Ásatrú and Odinist groups. The gods and goddesses may also be viewed as real entities.

The factor that either makes them racists, or gives them the potential for racism, is their insistence on religion as a genetic development as well as an intrinsic part of the human essence. Stephen McNallen, who leads the Asatru Folk Assembly, calls this idea “Metagenetics” and writes:

"One of the most controversial tenets of Asatru is our insistence that ancestry matters-that there are spiritual and metaphysical implications to heredity, and that we are thus a religion not for all humanity, but rather one that calls only its own.1"

Toward the end of his article McNallen states, “We are intimately tied up with the fate of our whole people, for Asatru is an expression of the soul of our race.”2 In a later article McNallen refines some of his thoughts. He writes:

"Our religion is a function of who we are, not just what we believe. Since the human being is holistic entity, our spirituality cannot be considered something apart from our physical ancestry. In terms of both genetics and metagenetics, our ancestors are encoded into our very beings. From values and temperament- which have been shown to correlate statistically with heredity-to the deeper issues of spirit, our forefathers and foremothers continue to influence us.3 "

Likewise, an article found at “Heathen front,” explaining what AHF (Allgermanische Heidnische Front) is, states that ethnic religions “are the most suitable ones.” The writer explains they are “manifestations of the inner self of every people, and expression of their collective subconscious.”4"

The author of the “creed” pages for Heathen Front's website also writes, “We believe that every religion is a projection of the völkish archetype, morals and ethics.”5 This means that all religion comes from tribal or racial experience as opposed to universal human experience. It certainly denies that an absolute and personal Creator God reveals Himself to all of humanity.

The need to protect a racial religion from outside cultural and ethnic influences by refusing membership to other races is not only problematic, but seems racist. One would have to protect the racial group from contamination by other races in order to keep the religion pure since religion is seen as the essence of the race.

1 Stephen McNallen, “Metagenetics”, An Odinist Anthology, (1983), http://www.runestone.org/metag.html.
2 Ibid., 4.
3 Stephen McNallen, “Metagenetics- an Update- Genetics & Beyond: the Ultimate Connection,” The Runestone, (Summer 1999) http://www.runestone.org/metag2.html.
4 What is AHF? Introduction, On File
5 What is AHF? Our Creed, On File