Sunday, August 20, 2023

The Second Coming of Fascism to the United States



 


,Volodymyr Zelensky, the president of Ukraine, is Jewish—his grandfather fought with the red army against the Nazis.[1] It was when I read that Tucker Carlson, the recently fired Fox news commentator, stated on his new Tweeter show that the President of Ukraine was “rat like,” a Nazi reference to Jews, that I decided to write this essay.[2] 

There was another time when fascists vied for power in the United States. They even attempted to place their own candidate in the White House. Some were isolationist who didn’t want to be involved in a war against Hitler. Some were very far right and involved in Nazi radicalism such as the Silver Shirts. Some were businessmen and senators who were doing business with Nazi companies.  Two well-known men were religious fanatics, one Catholic and one Protestant, both anti-Semites. Father Charles E Coughlin produced a popular radio program aimed at promoting Jew hatred and Gerald Burton Winrod, son of a protestant minister, published Nazi slanted material, had a radio program and spent time in Germany visiting with German officials. [3] And finally there was the growing movement of American firsters eventually led by famous aviator Charles Lindbergh.[4]

Bradley w. Hart in his book, Hitler’s American Friends writes of Lindbergh’s speech in Iowa, September 11, 1941, “Before a crowd of thousands, he denounced ‘the  British, the Jewish and the Roosevelt Administration’ for pushing the country toward war. ‘We cannot allow the natural passions and prejudices of other people to lead our country to destruction.’ He concluded If America were to enter the war, he warned darkly, Jews would ‘be among the first to feel its consequences.”[5]

Lindbergh’s attitude toward the Jews was confirmed by an earlier passage in his journal. Hart quotes Lindbergh

We feel that the Jews are among the most active agitators, and among the most influential. … We feel that, on the one hand it is essential to avoid anything approaching a pogrom; and that , on the other hand ,it is just as essential to combat the pressure the Jews are bringing on this country to enter the war. The Jewish influence is subtle, dangerous and very difficult to expose. As a race … they seem to invariably cause trouble.[6]

This was the earlier Fascist movement in the United States before World War II. But is there a definition of fascism that fits both this past movement and todays American Fascism?

George L. Mosse, who has written many books on the culture of Nazism, in his book The Fascist Revolution: Toward a General Theory of Fascism points to several important aspects of Fascism. He writes:

Nationalism is a belief system which provided the foundation for all Fascists movements, it was the bed rock upon which they were built. Racism of prime importance to Germany enhanced nationalism and gave it its cutting edge. Finally Fascism must be understood as a nationalist revolution with its own ideology and its own goals.[7]

 Mosse also writes:

Ideas of regeneration, of sacrifice, and a vision of utopia were the staple of all of fascism, as was the need to triumph over ever present enemies. If a heightened nationalism became a civic religion than racism for all its scientific pretentions was a belief system as well. [8]   

And on religion Mosse, writing of National Socialism, points out the need for ritual, myth and symbolism and explains that fascism borrowed from Christianity. He clarifies:

Christianity was used in order to give fascism a familiar cast, to make it correspond to something people knew well. The structure of one belief system reinforced another. These borrowings from Christianity were, of course, stripped of their content, and nationalism was substituted instead.[9]

Having explained the features, structure and ideology of fascism, I want to point out that I am not writing about conservatives, I am after all a conservative. Nor do I include all of those who are lumped under Trumpism, although many do fit into this category. And notice that not everyone will be racist although it is possible that the movement will move into that dark abyss.  Thinking of Anti-Semitism, some already have.

I have already named Tucker Carlson, and other articles I have written provide characters that fit the fascist mold. For instance Bo Polny, a New Apostolic Reformation pastor who is predicting the hanging of enemies on television as well as a utopian ending to a financial collapse, fits squarely into this frame. But basically I want to look at the fascist ideology as it is being expressed in an American, mostly far right and religious, context, rather than looking at people. Still, that will, in some cases mean pointing to some people.

Nationalism is certainly a part of the rising fascism, it is the foundation for most of the movement. The adherents are being called to a pseudo “Christian” nationalism. “Christian” because the leaders insist that those in the movement must battle for a Christian nation. Pseudo because their idea of Christian falls short of orthodox Christianity

Those tending toward fascism in the United States are using Christianity in a more literal way than those in Nazi Germany. Perhaps because as Arthur C. Cochrane points out in The Church’s Confession Under Hitler the so called theologians backing Hitler were, “a liberal, nationalistic sect.” The nationalists in America call themselves evangelical. They attempt to at least project their image as biblical Christians. But leadership is still manipulating faith for the sake of political advantage. Using it as a means to legitimize their nationalist ideology.

The so called “Christian Nationalist” in the United States have Christian worship services not only at churches but within various conferences and rallies. For instance at Clay Clark’s The Reawaken America Tour there are sermons, baptisms and prayers but they are mixed with political speeches, the promise of jail and death to enemies and a constant stream of conspiracy narratives. The Fascist undertone is the political slant of sermons and prophecies, all laced with the promise of utopia. Not the second coming of Jesus and the new heaven and new earth but the wiping out of enemies—Democrats, Communists, Marxist, and Globalist. A work that is human centered rather than God given and comes with no offer of the grace of Christ.

. Not unlike the National Socialist of Germany such leaders as Michael Flynn and Clay Clark as well as too many pastors who follow them insist on twin allegiances to both State and Church. Not the State as it is in reality, full of saint and sinner and a great deal of diversity, but their ideal state—a projection of their own ideology.

Michael Flynn has suggested that followers put away their Bibles and instead study the Constitution, the Federalist Papers and other founding documents. These are of course great documents to study, protect and care about but the Word of God comes first. The Word of God is the Christian’s authority. When German Christians in their Rengsdorf Theses wrote “There is no contradiction between an unreserved position in favor of the gospel on the one hand and an equally unreserved position in favor of German nationality (National Socialist State) on the other hand.” Theologian Karl Barth responded:

The Christian Confession of Faith is the only “unreserved” position that is required of us and permitted to us. Hence all other positions (including those in regard to German nationality and the National Socialist State) are subject to reservations.

Whoever today talks about two ‘unreserved’ positions imagines he is able to serve Yehweh and Baal, God and Mammon, and places himself outside the evangelical Church.[10]

One must say the same thing to the American Church, “Christian Nationalism” is a contradiction in terms—the Christian Confession of Faith is our only unreserved position.

In this American fascist movement are those who have moved into a Nazi flavored fascism plus there are those who have cast aside any sense of Christian orthodoxy. I have written about one particular person, Scott McKay who detests the Christian Church predicting that all Christianity will change and be involved in Christ consciousness a rather New Age sounding spirituality. He connects both on his platform and others with wildly fringe religious views which even includes aliens. And yet he is invited to speak at Clay Clark’s Reawaken American Tour.

McKay also holds to some very strong anti-Semitic conspiracy theories. CNN reporter Jake Tapper in a video on Facebook shows a small part of a video where McKay states that Hitler was fighting the same enemies that he and others are fighting.  He also points to another anti-Semite Charlie Ward. Tapper contacted Eric Trump Jr. who is not only a part of Clay Clark’s Reawaken America Tour but also the son of ex-President Donald Trump. In the exchange with Trump Jr. and Clark it is still uncertain whether McKay was allowed to speak at recent conferences or future ones. What is certain is that McKay is still speaking at many of the rallies and conferences provided by different adherents of Christian nationalism.

There are others who have also moved into the very radical and uglier side of fascism such as Nickolas Fuentes who denies the Holocaust; his followers are referred to as Groypers. This mixture of occultic views, anti-Semitism and other’s attempt to hold on to Christian “nationalism” is not unlike the fascist movements in both Germany and American during the 1920’s and 30s.

So where does the Church belong in the midst of all of this? Faithfulness to Jesus has nothing to do with promoting a Christian nation but instead lifting up the Lord and His kingdom. When Pilate asked Jesus if he was a king, Jesus answered that He was but said “My kingdom is not of this world. If My kingdom were of this world then my servants would be fighting so that I would not be handed over to the Jews but as it is My kingdom is not of this realm(John 18:36).

While there are social evils that the Church must stand against such as racism, sexual abuse, abortion and social ills such as homelessness, addiction and poverty that Christians must work and pray for solutions to, this should not be the major focus of the Church in the midst of a faith crisis. That there are those who call themselves Christians who are confused and misled applauding the heresy of giving “unreserved” allegiance, as it has been put, to political parties and political leaders placed on golden pedestals, will produce a nightmare for the faithful. We simply cannot stand in two places.

The solution however is not political nor is it activism but the call the church has always possessed. Go into the world and preach the gospel. Stay faithful to Jesus Christ—neither the right nor the left.  Continue being the Church—she is upheld by the Lord and in the midst of what may seem like unbearable upheavals she will be the one steady, stable haven open to those who seek safety and comfort.



[3] Bradley W. Hart, Hitler’s American Friends: The Third Reich’s Supporters in the United States, “The Religious Right,”  (Thomas Dunne Books St Martin’s Press: New York), See also, Hitler in Los Angeles: How Jews Foiled Nazi Plots Against Hollywood and America by Steven J. Ross       `

[4] Ibid. Hitler’s, “America First.”               

[5] Ibid, Hitler’s, “Lindbergh sees a Plot for War,” New York Times. 2; Berg, 427.

[6] Ibid. Hitler’s American, 179, 181.

 

[7] I should explain that Mosse points out that not all Fascists nations were racist. Spain was not and at first Italy was not.

 

[8] George L. Mosse, The Fascist Revolution: Toward a General Theory of Fascism, (New York: Howard Fertic 1999) xi, xv.

[9] Mosse, The Fascist Revolution, xii.

[10] Arthur C. Cochrane, The Church’s Confession Under Hitler, (Philadelphia: Westminster Press 1961) 120,121.

https://youtu.be/0FhK1CBpVso

Saturday, July 15, 2023

The Sound of Freedom and a serious problem with truth

 

picture by Melissa Tregilgas
by Viola Larson

I’m writing about “The Sound of Freedom” and first I want to put down some facts about the movie which I admit I have not seen. And then I intend to point to one particular serious problem with the whole enterprise. It is a problem that is so serious that it is possible to lead many Christians away from the seriousness of child sexual abuse and send them toward a damnable ideology.

The first fact is that this movie is about a horrendous and grievous subject, human trafficking and in particular the trafficking of children. A subject we should all care about, seeking God’s mercy and help.

Secondly most writers who disparage the movie at least admit that it does not draw on conspiracy theories to fill out the plot. Rather it is somewhat of an action movie portraying the work of Tim Ballard and his organization Operation Underground Railroad as they rescue children in South America.

Third fact Tim Ballard is a devout Latter Day Saint (Mormon) who speaks of his faith. On a LDS video he quotes from the Book of Mormon a verse he says has helped him in a time of fear, Alma chapter 58, verse eleven. [1]

The fourth fact, the actor who plays Tim Ballard, Jim Caviezel, is a devout Christian, a Roman Catholic. In many interviews he speaks of loving Jesus and even of Jesus’ return. But here lies the problem possibly tied to an extreme naivety.

Caviezel has promoted the movie on many far right and even QAnon platforms including Steve Bannon’s War Room, and he promotes many awful conspiracy theories in the process.

 Caviezel believes the conspiracy theory that many elites torture and kill children to drain their blood to obtain what is called adrenochrome which supposedly (but not really) gives youth to those who use it.[2] He states that such officials as the CIA and FBI are the main perpetrators of child trafficking. He insists that barrels of children’s body parts and blood are going to bio-labs in Ukraine thus implicating Ukrainian officials in the crime.[3]  Accusations of child stealing to obtain their blood is an ancient conspiracy theory used against the Jews.  And that old anti-Semite ruse, the use of bankers, mainly the Rothschild’s, Caviezel names as those who are involved in child trafficking.

Many Christians and others who consider themselves patriots seeing the actor who played Jesus in The Passion of the Christ and now plays a heroic man rescuing children in the jungles of South America will without thinking believe such horrid lies. This is what happened to too many Germans during the Nazi years. They excused and followed monsters because they believed the stories that the Jews were destroying their nation, their families and their culture. Today people are being asked to believe that many in Hollywood, the FBI, CIA, DOJ, and Democrats are stealing children, raping, torturing, and killing them for their blood.

This is not to say that there isn’t a terrible plague of human trafficking, there is, and there are people and organizations working against this crime. They understand that human greed and lust are the motivating factors in such sins. Some of the organizations are Child Rescue Coalition, The Tim Tebow Foundation Lantern Rescue  Hug Project, and National Child Protection Force.

The person who follows the conspiracies touted by Caviezel may finally attempt to solve these problems, which are based on lies, by political means and/or violence. That is what happened with the incident called Pizza/gate. Some conspiracy advocates kept insisting that there was a pizza parlor in Washington D.C. where elite democrats (The Clintons for one) were holding children, torturing and killing them for their blood. One man hearing this was so incensed he went there with a rifle meaning to rescue children. As it turned out there were no kidnaped children and although shots were fired no one was hurt. The man was sentenced to prison.

In a recent blog posting entitled We cannot promote conspiracies and still be prepared to speak of the one who is Truth.I wrote, “We cannot promote conspiracies and still be prepared to speak of the one who is Truth. We cannot major in our own particular ideology over the truth of the triune God of the Bible. Our urgency, if we are faithful, whether apologist or simply follower of Jesus, must be to clear away the rubbish of false doctrine which includes conspiracies. It is to make the path clear so that others can freely rejoice in Truth as they submit to the Lordship of Christ.” Our children are in trouble—they need us to major in truth and in their safety.

Tuesday, May 30, 2023

The Manifested Sons of God, The New Apostolic Reformation and Dark Political Visions

 

by Viola Larson

When words such as suffering, cross bearing, humility, repentance and forgiveness are spoken the Christian generally feels drawn into a familiar circle. It is a hard circle, but full of the warmth, compassion and love of Jesus. It is rarely full of glory or worldly victory or great prosperity, it may be full of sorrow and even despair. But Jesus, He remains within the circle.

This article is about a festering “Christian” movement preparing to bypass the cross and insisting on glory, worldly victory and great prosperity. I am returning to issues I have written about in the past, over thirty years ago. Then it was family and church members entering my office with tapes and booklets asking me to review them and explain what their family or friend was involved in. Now it is a movement turning political and dangerous, marrying the Christian name to ideas of vengeful violence.

Years ago writing about two heretical religious movements I saw they were so connected that I could see them merging into one large movement. One group was Christian Identity, a movement of anti-Semites who believed that most white people were descended from ancient Israel, and that the actual Jews were the literal children of Satan.

The other group, often referred to as the Manifested Sons of God, believe they will overcome and destroy evil and even death before the return of Jesus; these two groups were so mixed that I eventually wrote a paper on the Manifested Sons of God which contained quotes from both groups. And then I focused on the racist group and wrote Christian Identity: A “Christian” Religion for White Racist.

Recently I read three books on the New Apostolic Reformation, a movement that contains adherents to the Manifested Sons of God teaching. All of the books are written by Holly Pivec and R. Douglas Geivett.  The books are: Counterfeit Kingdom: The Dangers of New Revelation, New Prophets, and New Age Practices in the Church; A New Apostolic Reformation?: A Biblical Response to a Worldwide Movement; and God’s Super Apostles: Encountering the Worldwide Prophets and Apostles Movement. The books reminded me of my past papers on the Restoration Movement and The Manifested Sons of God.

The movements I wrote about were the very early beginnings of the movements Pivec and Geivett have written about. Their information is excellent. They not only write about the heretical ideas but analyze them from a strong biblical point of view.

Recently I wrote about Clay Clark, Michael Flynn and Scott McKay who are part of the far right and hold many conspiracy views.[1] They all, along with others such as Julie Green who is considered a prophet and Eric Trump the son of past president Donald Trump, are a part of Clay Clark’s The Reawaken America Tour, and many have connections to the New Apostolic Reformation. While pastors and writers such as Lance Wallnau and Eric Metaxas may not have attended the tour they have interacted with and interviewed many participants including Clay Clark. The movement’s connections are growing within the far right political groups.                                

Among many of them one hears that God isn’t ready for the tribulation so Christians must fight against the so-called globalists, Marxists and Democrats in order to delay it. From Eric Metaxas [2]one hears that if Christians don’t fall in line, obeying the political ideology pushed by the far right, a greater evil than the Holocaust will happen. Pastor Michael Petro a Manifested Sons of God teacher suggests to Bo Polny, his video guest, that the early church taught that God would “pull a remnant out of the church then God will cloth them in the glory that Adam lost and they will pull the greatest revival that’s ever been seen.” Polny agrees with him.[3]

In their speeches and sermons atonement is rarely mentioned but when it is, it is sadly connected to political salvation. God is going to help Christians overcome and rule the nations by destroying their enemies. In a slide show Bo Polny, one of the supposed prophets, is predicting what he calls the Haman effect, a televised hanging of the movement’s enemies.[4] Some are predicting a catastrophe with banks and financial institutions in many countries failing and most wealth, meaning all gold, silver and real-estate, falling into the hands of the Christians who belong to this movement. And some antisemitism is connected to this particular prediction since several refer to the banks as controlled by the “Khazarian Mafia” which is simply a name taken from a Baltic tribe that converted to Judaism and is mythicized by several members of The Reawaken America Tour into evil conspirators.

There are two ways open to followers of Jesus in this moment. One is biblical consisting of both quietness in lifestyle (1Thess 4:11) and courage in confession. The other comes from the father of lies and lifts up sensuality, pride, a security that is tied to human strife and manipulation. Some theologians refer to the two as the difference between a theology of glory and a theology of the cross.[5] The first seeks constant victory, material blessings and supernatural events; the other clings to Jesus, accepting a cross that mirrors His.

The first doesn’t begin erroneous, it begins with the truthful understanding that God is the creator who is powerful. (Rom. 1:19-20) But the kindness and compassion of God understood in the life, death and resurrection of Jesus is not known by simply finding God in creation. God’s revelation in scripture is Jesus Christ and God’s gift through Him of forgiveness of sins and everlasting life. While many in the NAR movement and those on the extreme right speak of God, even Jesus and salvation, they focus, as I have noted, on God’s power, vengeance and His material blessings. They see supernatural signs as proof of their own righteousness and correctness predicting a great revival when people see how the world’s wealth has fallen into their hands.

The second way Christians are called in this moment, and that by the Holy Spirit, is the way of the cross. We are called to live a life that is often full of suffering. We are called to live our life in quietness, confident only in the knowledge of our relationship to our Lord and our hope in the resurrection.

And we are called to make our confession to others including both the far left and the far right.  

Lance Wallnau, one of the New Apostolic Reformation leaders, teaches there is a difference between the Jesus who came to suffer for our sins and the end times Jesus; not in his person but in his attitudes and function. Wallnau sees the first as the compassionate Christ and the end times Jesus as the vengeful warrior. But Jesus does not change, As Hebrews states He is “the same yesterday and today and forever (Heb 13:8).” He is always the compassionate Lord and He is always the ruling King.

The problem with Wallnau’s teaching about Jesus coming back as a wrathful warrior is not this image, but rather his teaching that Christians must now become more like the end times Jesus in their ministry seeking power in the various cultural vocations including government and education. But rather Jesus called His followers, before His return, to abide in Him, to make disciples, to pray for rulers and individuals, to pray for deliverance from human evil and immorality, to care for those in need. We are not called to seek power, position or wealth in his name.

Yes, Christians have vocations in this world, doctors, teachers, senators, home keepers to name a few, but those vocations are not meant to be political attempts to defeat enemies.  

This festering movement consisting of heretical pastors, so called prophets and apostles, political extremists and the people they are seducing may in the end scatter, find darker visions and fade into nothingness. Or they may become connected to an elected leader and believe they are fulfilling their own prophecies. They may even attempt to fulfill their darker violent visions. Prayers for them and their followers. Prayers for the Church.

But sanctify Christ as Lord in your hearts, always being ready to make a defense to everyone who asks you to give an account for the hope that is in you, yet with gentleness and reverence (1 Peter 4:15).



[5] Gene Edward Veith Jr.. The Spirituality of the Cross, (Saint Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 2011); New Dictionary of Theology, Sinclair B. Ferguson, David F. Wright, Editors, J.I. Packer, Consulting Editor, The Theology of the Cross, R.J. Bauckham. (Downers Grove: intervarsity Press: 1988).

 

Friday, October 21, 2022

Letter to the American Church by Eric Metaxas: An attack on "Faith Alone": a book review by Viola Larson

 


Sometime around 2011, 2012, my husband and I were boarding a plane on our way to a Presbyterian renewal meeting. It was an event meant to discuss forming a new Presbyterian denomination.  We discovered that many other Presbyterians were also boarding and many of them were carrying a book by Eric Metaxas, Bonhoeffer: Pastor, Martyr, Prophet, Spy. Some of us sensed renewal and courage in the book. I even used some thoughts out of the book to blog about the politics of 2016, Donald Trump, allowing himself to be an idol: playing with the Führer Principle not realizing that Metaxas evolving politically and religiously would, over the years, severely disagree with my posting.

Recently someone sent me a link to Metaxas speaking as a guest on James Robison’s show The Stream.[1] He was being interviewed by Robison about his new book Letter to the American Church. Metaxas has been interviewed by many evangelical pastors and has spoken at many evangelical churches about his book. Many will hear only his warning about their silence on abortion, transgenderism and same sex marriage, issues that are troubling evangelical and orthodox Christians. They may not hear his underlying attempts at justifying ultra conservative politics over the proclamation of the gospel. Many will not understand or realize that Metaxas is, probably unintentionally, attacking their faith and their vocation.

Metaxas is using Bonhoeffer, the church in Nazi Germany and the Holocaust to warn the American Church that if they are silent they will be the cause of an event worse than the Holocaust. In his interview with Robison he insists that the warnings are not his but God’s. Metaxas states:

“Of course it’s not me talking when you title a book Letter to the American Church I’m not arrogant enough to think that this is a letter from Eric Metaxas to the amer… this is in the tradition of letters to the Philippians. … You know you want to write exactly what you think the Lord is saying”

 Metaxas goes on to say, “what I believe the Lord is trying to say in this book is exactly what he said through Bonhoeffer to the German Church which they did not listen to.” He goes on to portray Bonhoeffer as the prophet that the church in Germany did not listen to and he blames most of the church in Germany for causing the Holocaust.

I see four problems with Letter to the American Church. First, although Metaxas does not, in his book, claim it is God’s word to the American church, still he has done so in public. But only Scripture is God’s word to the Church.  

Second, Metaxas lays out a simplistic history of the church in Nazi Germany and uses it to hold the American Church accountable for a future social disaster that is greater than the Holocaust. Third, Metaxas’ goes beyond concerns of orthodox Christians and includes what he refers to as globalism, which has nothing to do with biblical principles and is generally part of the debate about nationalism and isolationism.  It is a very political term. Fourth, and I believe this is the most troubling problem, Metaxas plays with biblical doctrine attempting to water down such teaching as salvation by faith alone and evangelizing/preaching the gospel, in order to emphasize the church’s need to be political.

Of the German church Metaxas does write in chapter five of the difference between the Confessing Church pastors and the German Christians but he only refers by name to Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Martin Niemoller and Karl Barth. Metaxas writes of the drafting of the Barmen Declaration, declaring “It essentially said that the German state must not and could not co-opt the Church, that the sanctity and separation of the Church from the state must be clear.”[2] Yet the Barmen Declaration said so much more, it begins with the essential truth of the Church, it begins with the Gospel, the word of God.

…1. I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father, but by me.” (John14:6) “Truly, truly I say unto you, he who does not enter the sheepfold by the door but climbs in by another way, that man is a thief and a robber … I am the door; if anyone enters by me, he will be saved.” (John 10:1,9.)

Jesus Christ, as he is attested for us in Holy Scripture, is the one Word of God which we have to hear and which we have to trust and obey in life and in death.

We reject the false doctrine, as through the Church could and would have to acknowledge as a source of its proclamation, apart from and besides this one Word of God, still other events and powers, figures and truths as God’s revelation.”[3]

Often, in Letter to the American Church, Metaxas is both outwardly and subtly pleading with the Church to fight its battles in the political arena more so than proclaiming: the gospel. He believes the Church must change its tactics because of the changing times. But Barmen places the Gospel as the priority of the Church. Karl Barth, who Metaxas acknowledges and who is the main author of Barmen (Bonhoeffer was in London pastoring when the synod of Barmen was held) writes in his small booklet, Theological Existence Today:

Of course something has to be done; very much so; but most decidedly nothing other than this, viz. that the Church congregations be gathered together again, but aright and anew in fear and great joy, to the Word by means of the Word. All the crying over the Church will not deliver the Church. Where the Church is the Church she is already delivered. Let persecution be never so severe, it will not affect her! ‘Still’ it is said, ‘still, shall the City of God abide, lusty beside her tiny stream’ (Psalm xlvi. 5; Luther’s translation).[4]

Metaxas too often merges the two differing church groups, the German Christians and the Confessing Church, using them as straw men in order to make his point that the silence of the church in Germany was the cause of the Holocaust and that the Church in America might also become a cause of disaster. There was a group of churchmen, the German Christians, who sought to gain power, political power, by aligning with a tyrant, a madman who constantly sought power and lied about his intentions to protect the Christian faith. His religion was in a positive Christianity with no place for the Jesus of the cross. 

The German Christians did not cause the Holocaust but they did contribute to it by their political maneuvering and their unfaithfulness to the Lord of the Church, Jesus Christ. They too had no place for a suffering Savior.

There was a true Church, the Confessing Church, yes weak, and sometimes silent when they needed to speak out but nonetheless faithful to Christ holding to the teachings of the Word. Dean G. Stroud, editor of the book, Preaching in Hitler’s Shadow writes of the pastors preaching the gospel in such a way that Hitler and Nazism was confronted. He writes:

Compared to Christ how small Hitler appeared. Against the horrible distortion of words by Goebbels and his propaganda machine the Christian in the pulpit offered the truth of the gospel and the integrity of the “word made flesh.” In so doing certain themes stand out in these sermons of opposition: the authority of Jesus Christ; the sovereignty of God; both the Old and New Testaments as Holy Scripture; the purity of the church; the certainty of God’s judgement on Germany for immorality and for failure to love the neighbor, especially the Jewish brother and sister; the relevance of the gospel after the European Enlightenment and in spite of Nazi pseudoscience and paganism; and the gospel’ insistence that Christians must risk even their lives for the truth of Christianity. [5]

This leads to my biggest concern with Letter to the American Church. Metaxas plays with some basic biblical doctrines in an attempt to justify politics and advocacy over the preaching of the Gospel. Writing of Luther’s attempts at justification through his own works and his delight in the free gift of grace he found in Scripture, Metaxas states:

But in his understandably giddy joy, Luther may sometimes have gone a bit farther than necessary, or at least opened the door for others to do so. For example, when he translated Romans 3:28 from the original New Testament Greek into German, Luther added the single word “alone” to the following sentence: ‘For we hold that one is justified by faith apart from the law.’ Luther’s version was, ‘Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith alone without the deeds of the law.’ Luther felt the need to add that word to underscore what for him was essentially the central idea in the universe, and he may be forgiven for this. [6]

Metaxas in his attack goes on to write:

We might say that Luther had in his zeal made an idol of his idea of faith, so that the genuine faith to which God calls us was crowded out.[7]

Bringing this idea to the question of the Church in Germany during the Nazi years and the American Church today, Metaxas writes:

The phrase ‘faith alone’ had made the Christian faith so simple—and ultimately so thin and one-dimensional—that over time it was easily and blithely assented to by nearly everyone in the German nation, so that Bonhoeffer wrote about it in the Cost of Discipleship.[8]

However countering Metaxas’ opinions about Luther’s translation is information on the web site Reformation Room. Luther was not attempting to develop new doctrine but was concerned with translation. He was “simply striving to bring the precision of the Greek into the German.” And while it is mainly Roman Catholics who dispute his translation still many of them except it. For instance Timothy George, Associate Professor of historical theology and church history at the Southern Baptist theological Seminary in Louisville, author of Theology of the Reformers, places a note under his commentary on Luther’s use of faith alone:

 Luther did not of course invent this phrase. The German Bible published at Nurnberg in 1483 translated Galatians 2:16 as ‘gerechtfertigt … nur durch den Glauben.’ [justified by faith alone] Further the term sola fide was well established in the Catholic tradition having been used by Origen, Hilary, Chrysostom, Augustine, Bernard, Aquinas, and others but without Luther’s particular nuances.[9]

Going further Metaxas mentions that Bonhoeffer in his Cost of Discipleship wrote about Luther’s translation and its bad influence on the German population. But the truth is Bonhoeffer never accused Luther’s translation, nor joy in grace alone, of being the reason the German Christians became so lukewarm. He in fact uses Luther to refute their lazy discipleship.  Bonhoeffer writes:

When he spoke of grace, Luther always implied as a corollary that it cost him his own life, the life which was now for the first time subjected to the absolute obedience of Christ. Only so could he speak of grace. Luther had said that grace alone can save, his followers took up his doctrine and repeated it word for word. But left out the invariable corollary.  There was no need for Luther to always mention that corollary explicitly for he always spoke as one who had been led by grace to the strictest following of Christ.[10]

Metaxas believes he is calling the Church to a righteous cause. Yes, Christians and others must speak against the killing of the unborn, for the sacredness of marriage between man and \ woman and speak against the mutilation of the body in order to claim a new gender identity. But the calling of the Church is much deeper. It is not a call to politics but a call to the cross, to the suffering Savior—a call to the gospel. Faith is a gift that God gives through Jesus Christ. As Paul writes in Ephesians:

“For by grace you have been saved through faith; and that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God; not as a result of works, so that no one may boast. (Eph. 2:8,9 NASB)

Even the good works we are called to are prepared by God so we fulfill His purposes as a gift.

For we are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand so that we would walk in them.(Eph. 10 NASB)

Rather than applauding Metaxas’ attack on “grace alone” the Church should be frightened at the possibility of a new, perhaps old, darkness entering the Church.

 



[2] Eric Metaxas, Letter to the American Church, (Salem Books: Washington D.C. 2022) 43.

[3] Arthur C. Cochrane, The Church’s Confession Under Hitler, appendix VII, ( Westminster: Philadelphia 1961) 239

[4] Karl Barth, Theological Existence To-Day: A plea for theological freedom, ( Hodder and Stoughton: London 1933) 77,78.

[5] Dean C Stroud, editor, Preaching in Hitler’s Shadow: Sermons of Resistance in the Third Reich, (William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company: Grand Rapids 2013) 48.

[6] Metaxas, Letter, 57,58.

[7] Ibid, Letter, 58.

[8] Ibid, 67.

[9] CF.Kling, pp 249-250, Timothy George, Theology of the Reformers, (Broadman Press:

Nashville 1988) 70-71.

[10] Dietrich Bonhoeffer, The Cost of Discipleship, (A Touchstone Book, Simon & Toronto: New York 1995) 40-50.


Wednesday, April 6, 2022

The Awful Lie-The Ukrainians are not Nazis, but Putin and Russian leadership should assume the title

 


Jonah Goldberg of The Dispatch, in his article, “Is It Okay To Use the ‘G-Word’? linked to a horrific article written by a Russian propagandist and published in a Russian state-owned “news agency RIA Novosti (Russian: РИА Новости).” The article, “What should Russia do with Ukraine?is posted in English at Medium.Com and introduced by Maria Kravchenko. Some of Kravchenko’s explanations are:

The author, a Russian political technologist, also has the audacity to talk about the Soviet occupation of Ukraine. He is trying to support Putin’s narrative about Ukraine as an artificial country. Instead, the world should remember that the Soviet Union terrorized Ukraine for almost a century with forced collectivization, Great Purge, Terror-Famine (Holodomor), forced deportation, etc.

In this article, the author is describing ways how Russians want to wipe out Ukraine in the same way the Soviet regime did it.”

All of the article is a lie and is a design for murdering, imprisoning and destroying Ukraine and its people. Kravchenko pleads:

It’s important to spread this article. The Russian war should be stopped now. It was supposed to be stopped 8 years ago when it only began. 71% of Russians feel proud about this war. 75.5% of Russians approve of the idea of a military invasion of the next country and believe that it should be Poland. According to respondents, this is a logical continuation of the so-called “military special operation of the Russian Federation”.

The world should be aware of Russian methods, crimes, and plans. Putin will not stop until he is stopped.

Also Timothy Snyder, a historian and professor at Yale and author of many books on authoritarian nations including, Bloodlands: Europe between Hitler and Stalin has referred to the article on Twitter writing, “An article in the official state Russian news agency RIA Novosti advocates the elimination of the Ukrainian people as such. The text is so despicable that I’m not going to link to it. Will write about it later.”

Hopefully he will write about it soon.

The article claiming most of Ukraine is Nazified attempts to purify Putin’s actions but in reality reveals an ideology that shows that the leadership of Russia is truly copying Nazi Germany. Some of the statements remind the reader of Hitler’s final solution of the Jewish people only now it is about the Ukrainian people.

For instance, “Apparently, the name “Ukraine” cannot be kept as a title of any fully denazified state entity on the territory liberated from the Nazi regime.”

And, “Unlike, for example, Georgia or the Baltic States, history has proved it impossible for Ukraine to exist as a nation-state, and any attempts to “build” such a nation-state naturally lead to Nazism. Ukrainism is an artificial anti-Russian construct that has no civilizational substance of its own, a subordinate element of an extraneous and alien civilization.”

 

Also: “Denazification as a goal of the special military operation within the limits of the operation itself means a military victory over the Kyiv regime, the liberation of the territories from the armed supporters of nazification, the elimination of hard-line Nazis, the imprisonment of war criminals, and the creating of systemic conditions for further denazification in peacetime.”

 

And: “— The seizure of educational materials and the prohibition of educational programs at all levels that contain Nazi ideological guidelines;

— Mass investigations aimed to establish personal responsibility for war crimes, crimes against humanity, the spread of Nazi ideology, and support for the Nazi regime;

— Lustration, making the names of accomplices of the Nazi regime public, involving them in forced labor to restore the destroyed infrastructure as punishment for Nazi activities (from among those who have not become subject to the death penalty or imprisonment);”

Remember every time the term Nazification or Nazi is used in this article it is a lie, an evil misuse of language in order to destroy a people. It is meant to allow Putin and the Russian Government to slander, kill, maim and destroy in the name of some kind of supposedly righteous angel who is in reality a demon from hell. An anti-Christ in words and actions.

All of those on the far right, the Christians on the far right, who are glorifying Putin or anyone who agrees with him are reminiscent of the German Christians during Hitler’s time who were willing to send Jews, socialists, the disabled and yes, even Confessing pastors to concentration camps and death chambers.